“…For example, society is benefitted by having a credible, honest medical community whom people can trust. Aroskar (1980) explained utilitarianism as focusing on societal "consequences of actions, on the greatest amount of happiness or the least amount of harm for the greatest number" (p. 659).…”
Section: Identifying Applicable Ethical Principles and Philosophiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loeb also says that '?tonoring ethical obligations ensures good," although some actions may be difficult and have painful consequences (p. 281). Aroskar (1980) says that deontology "considers the nature of an act itself" (p. 659). According to Kant's categorical imperative or principle of universalizability, one should act only on a maxim that can be applied in any similar situation (Aroskar, 1980).…”
Section: Norm At Ive Ethic A1 P Hi1 O S O P H Y : D E O N T O 1 O G Ymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aroskar (1980) says that deontology "considers the nature of an act itself" (p. 659). According to Kant's categorical imperative or principle of universalizability, one should act only on a maxim that can be applied in any similar situation (Aroskar, 1980). One example is to tell the truth always.…”
Section: Norm At Ive Ethic A1 P Hi1 O S O P H Y : D E O N T O 1 O G Ymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been called the golden rule principle: Treat others as one would want to be treated. Kant also believed that people should be treated as ends, not simply as means (Aroskar, 1980;Beauchamp & Childress, 1989). Kant's philosophy could have been applied to this case.…”
Section: Norm At Ive Ethic A1 P Hi1 O S O P H Y : D E O N T O 1 O G Ymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite any progress on the issue of veracity, High believed that doctors still failed to collaborate and share decision making with clients. Aroskar (1980) stated that "in the hospital setting, the physician is in the position of power and authority: but one cannot automatically conclude that the physician "is the best person to decide what is in the patient's best interest" (p. 661).…”
The process of solving an ethical dilemma is presented through use of a case study involving a dishonest doctor and a cancer patient. The described decision making process contributes to compliance with the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organization standard regarding ethics and patient care. Curtin's ethical decision-making framework is employed in this described process. Ethical principles and philosophies are considered in attempting to find the best ethical solution for the dilemma detailed in the case study. Source material is from personal experience and observation as well as published literature. In addition to being a JCAHO standard, the author concludes that a decision-making framework is useful in solving ethical dilemmas.
“…For example, society is benefitted by having a credible, honest medical community whom people can trust. Aroskar (1980) explained utilitarianism as focusing on societal "consequences of actions, on the greatest amount of happiness or the least amount of harm for the greatest number" (p. 659).…”
Section: Identifying Applicable Ethical Principles and Philosophiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loeb also says that '?tonoring ethical obligations ensures good," although some actions may be difficult and have painful consequences (p. 281). Aroskar (1980) says that deontology "considers the nature of an act itself" (p. 659). According to Kant's categorical imperative or principle of universalizability, one should act only on a maxim that can be applied in any similar situation (Aroskar, 1980).…”
Section: Norm At Ive Ethic A1 P Hi1 O S O P H Y : D E O N T O 1 O G Ymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aroskar (1980) says that deontology "considers the nature of an act itself" (p. 659). According to Kant's categorical imperative or principle of universalizability, one should act only on a maxim that can be applied in any similar situation (Aroskar, 1980). One example is to tell the truth always.…”
Section: Norm At Ive Ethic A1 P Hi1 O S O P H Y : D E O N T O 1 O G Ymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been called the golden rule principle: Treat others as one would want to be treated. Kant also believed that people should be treated as ends, not simply as means (Aroskar, 1980;Beauchamp & Childress, 1989). Kant's philosophy could have been applied to this case.…”
Section: Norm At Ive Ethic A1 P Hi1 O S O P H Y : D E O N T O 1 O G Ymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite any progress on the issue of veracity, High believed that doctors still failed to collaborate and share decision making with clients. Aroskar (1980) stated that "in the hospital setting, the physician is in the position of power and authority: but one cannot automatically conclude that the physician "is the best person to decide what is in the patient's best interest" (p. 661).…”
The process of solving an ethical dilemma is presented through use of a case study involving a dishonest doctor and a cancer patient. The described decision making process contributes to compliance with the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organization standard regarding ethics and patient care. Curtin's ethical decision-making framework is employed in this described process. Ethical principles and philosophies are considered in attempting to find the best ethical solution for the dilemma detailed in the case study. Source material is from personal experience and observation as well as published literature. In addition to being a JCAHO standard, the author concludes that a decision-making framework is useful in solving ethical dilemmas.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.