Anatomy of Potency Predictions Focusing on Structural Analogues with Increasing Potency Differences Including Activity Cliffs

Abstract

Potency predictions are popular in compound design and optimization but are complicated by intrinsic limitations. Moreover, even for nonlinear methods, activity cliffs (ACs, formed by structural analogues with large potency differences) represent challenging test cases for compound potency predictions. We have devised a new test system for potency predictions, including AC compounds, that is based on partitioned matched molecular pairs (MMP) and makes it possible to monitor prediction accuracy at the level of analogue pairs with increasing potency differences. The results of systematic predictions using different machine learning and control methods on MMP-based data sets revealed increasing prediction errors when potency differences between corresponding training and test compounds increased, including large prediction errors for AC compounds. At the global level, these prediction errors were not apparent due to the statistical dominance of analogue pairs with small potency differences. Test compounds from such pairs were accurately predicted and determined the observed global prediction accuracy. Shapley value analysis, an explainable artificial intelligence approach, was applied to identify structural features determining potency predictions using different methods. The analysis revealed that numerical predictions of different regression models were determined by features that were shared by MMP partner compounds or absent in these compounds, with opposing effects. These findings provided another rationale for accurate predictions of similar potency values for structural analogues and failures in predicting the potency of AC compounds.