2017
DOI: 10.4172/2168-9776.1000211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomy of Rootstocks and Scions in Four Pine Species

Abstract: When performing grafts, it is thought that by using plants of the same species the engraftment rate will be high; when the above is not fulfilled, the grafter, type of graft or the origin of the scions is blamed, but the anatomy of the parts forming the graft is not considered. The aim of this study was to evaluate the anatomy of four pine species used as rootstock and scion to define which species to use as rootstock based on cambium shape and bark thickness. Before grafting, 2-cm stem fractions were cut from… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest average value was obtained with the rootstocks of the same species (13 cm), while with P. pseudostrobus, P. ayacahuite, and P. hartwegii, it recorded lower growth differences (30, 78, and 90%, respectively) (Table 2). These results match other intraspecific grafting experiments, where a better response was obtained, as a consequence of the anatomical and histological affinity of the parts of the graft (Castro-Garibay et al, 2017).…”
Section: Graft Growthsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations

Interspecific grafting of Pinus patula

González-Jiménez,
Jiménez Casas,
López-Upton
et al. 2024
AP
“…The highest average value was obtained with the rootstocks of the same species (13 cm), while with P. pseudostrobus, P. ayacahuite, and P. hartwegii, it recorded lower growth differences (30, 78, and 90%, respectively) (Table 2). These results match other intraspecific grafting experiments, where a better response was obtained, as a consequence of the anatomical and histological affinity of the parts of the graft (Castro-Garibay et al, 2017).…”
Section: Graft Growthsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Both species belong to the same subgenus, but to a different subsection. This situation shows that a successful graft is more difficult in some pine species, perhaps as a result of factors related to the cambium characteristics and their internal conduction structures (Castro-Garibay et al, 2017). P. ayacahuite rootstocks recorded the lowest survival rate (Figure 1G).…”
Section: Graft Survivalmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations

Interspecific grafting of Pinus patula

González-Jiménez,
Jiménez Casas,
López-Upton
et al. 2024
AP