1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf00174013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomy of the cochlear nuclear complex of guinea pig

Abstract: The cyto- and fibre-architecture of the cochlear nuclear complex of the guinea-pig has been studied in serial sections using Nissl, Golgi and combined cell-myelin staining of normal material, and a silver degeneration method after cochlear ablation. The nuclear subdivisions and major cell types can be recognised on the basis of those found in the cat, but there are some differences between the two species in the precise distribution and morphology of the neurons. The rostrodorsal part of the anteroventral coch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

19
155
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(100 reference statements)
19
155
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, based on cell shape, and, when possible, the number and kinds of dendrites, and, on occasion, the location of the nucleus, we are able to suggest that our three cell categories ma3 , correspond to categories described by Cant and Morest (1984) in the cat and Moore (1986), Pirsig (1986) and Hackney et al (1990) in the guinea pig. The 'elongate' group could correspond to Pirsig's (1986) fusiform cells, Moore's (1986) 'horizontal fan' cells and Hackney et al's (1990) 'lacy, elongate cells' in the dorsal cochlear nucleus, and 'bipolar, giant' cells in dorsal cochlear nucleus and ventral cochlear nucleus. The 'polygonal' cells described here are more likely to correspond to multipolar cells (Pirsig, 1986;Cant and Morest, 1984;Moo~e, 1986 andHackney et al, 1990), but also would include cells described as giant multipolar or radiate by Pirsig (1968) and Hackney et al (1990).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, based on cell shape, and, when possible, the number and kinds of dendrites, and, on occasion, the location of the nucleus, we are able to suggest that our three cell categories ma3 , correspond to categories described by Cant and Morest (1984) in the cat and Moore (1986), Pirsig (1986) and Hackney et al (1990) in the guinea pig. The 'elongate' group could correspond to Pirsig's (1986) fusiform cells, Moore's (1986) 'horizontal fan' cells and Hackney et al's (1990) 'lacy, elongate cells' in the dorsal cochlear nucleus, and 'bipolar, giant' cells in dorsal cochlear nucleus and ventral cochlear nucleus. The 'polygonal' cells described here are more likely to correspond to multipolar cells (Pirsig, 1986;Cant and Morest, 1984;Moo~e, 1986 andHackney et al, 1990), but also would include cells described as giant multipolar or radiate by Pirsig (1968) and Hackney et al (1990).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Osen, 1969, Moore, 1986, Cant and Morest, 1984and Hackney et al, 1990 because intracellular features and dendritic patterns were not always accessible using WGA-HRP. However, based on cell shape, and, when possible, the number and kinds of dendrites, and, on occasion, the location of the nucleus, we are able to suggest that our three cell categories ma3 , correspond to categories described by Cant and Morest (1984) in the cat and Moore (1986), Pirsig (1986) and Hackney et al (1990) in the guinea pig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These retrogradely labeled neurons were mapped onto templates that included six transverse sections evenly extending from the caudal to rostral ends of the CN (i.e., the 14.3th, 28.6th, 42.9th, 57.2th, 71.5th, 85.8th percentiles). In cases where the BDA reaction product or FG filled both the soma and dendrites of a labeled cell, we tried to identify the cell type using the scheme of Hackney et al (1990).…”
Section: Image Processing and Confocal Laser Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cytoarchitectonic borders were added by comparison with adjacent, thioninstained sections. Borders within the cochlear nuclei were determined according to Hackney et al (1990). Labeled cortical cells were observed with a 40Â objective (NA = 0.85).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%