1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0959-289x(97)80005-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomy of the lumbar epidural region using magnetic resonance imaging: a study of dimensions and a comparison of two postures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another reason for choosing these levels was that they are the levels of the spine most often affected, due to their dependent position and weight-bearing nature (Borenstein et al, 2004). Previous studies gave thicknesses between 1.8 and 5 mm (Grenier et al, 1987;Olszewski et al, 1996;Capogna et al, 1997;Park et al, 2001). Our results concur with the previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Another reason for choosing these levels was that they are the levels of the spine most often affected, due to their dependent position and weight-bearing nature (Borenstein et al, 2004). Previous studies gave thicknesses between 1.8 and 5 mm (Grenier et al, 1987;Olszewski et al, 1996;Capogna et al, 1997;Park et al, 2001). Our results concur with the previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Other studies have shown normal thicknesses of the LF, ranging from 1.8 to 5 mm. 4,[9][10][11] Our results for normal LF thickening, showing a mean of 3.1 mm, are similar to the findings in these studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Many factors associated with neuraxial anaesthesia have been studied including the structures at the level of the termination of the spinal cord and dural sac [11], vertebral level and shape of the conus medullaris [12], shape of the epidural space [13][14][15], and distance from the skin to the epidural or subarachnoid spaces [16][17][18][19]. However, the effect of body position relevant to neuraxial blockade has not been well studied [20][21][22][23][24], especially in children.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%