1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0185(199704)247:4<542::aid-ar13>3.0.co;2-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomy of the sheep spine and its comparison to the human spine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
254
1
12

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 334 publications
(273 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
254
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Our VCW values are also similar, increasing $17% caudally from C3 to C7. Our results do not correspond as well to those measured from sheep (Wilke et al, 1997) in which vertebral canal depth has been reported to increase (by 17%) from C3 to C7. It is unclear whether these relate to functional differences between species, or are the result of different measurement protocols [microCT in the current study vs. a handheld micrometer in Wilke et al (1997)].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Our VCW values are also similar, increasing $17% caudally from C3 to C7. Our results do not correspond as well to those measured from sheep (Wilke et al, 1997) in which vertebral canal depth has been reported to increase (by 17%) from C3 to C7. It is unclear whether these relate to functional differences between species, or are the result of different measurement protocols [microCT in the current study vs. a handheld micrometer in Wilke et al (1997)].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…It must be emphasized, however, that this opinion is not substantiated in the literature: neither experimental nor theoretical studies were found that show a fundamental difference between the mechanical loading of quadruped and biped spines. On the contrary, several studies show striking similarities in geometry [8,18,43], indicating that quadruped and biped spines must be loaded in a similar way. This idea is further substantiated by studies in which the mechanical properties of spinal segments of sheep, calf and humans have been shown to be comparable [41,42].…”
Section: Theo H Smitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the position of the facet joints, which are oriented at an angle between the sagittal and frontal planes [8,40]. In the thoracic segments, however, the facet joints are more or less aligned in the frontal plane, which leads to a much lower stiffness (1.0-2.1 Nm/ degree), allowing larger rotations [40,43]. Again, muscular forces or ligaments are required to prevent major distortions of the upper trunk.…”
Section: Spinal Loads In a Walking And Running Quadrupedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparative studies showed that the motion characteristics of the intact spines of calf and sheep are surprisingly similar to those of the human [20,22]. Also, qualitatively, the anatomy of the lumbar spine of these species is similar, yet the sizes partially differ considerably [5,21]. Even based on such comparative data, it is difficult to predict whether a certain species is suitable to test a certain implant because a complex combination of various morphological and functional parameters needs to be considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%