2018
DOI: 10.1101/488809
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ancestral and offspring nutrition interact to affect life history traits inDrosophila melanogaster

Abstract: 16 Ancestral environmental conditions can impact descendant phenotypes through a variety of 17 epigenetic mechanisms. Previous studies on transgenerational effects in Drosophila 18 melanogaster suggest that parental nutrition may affect the body size, developmental duration , 19and egg size of the next generation. However, it is unknown whether these effects on phenotype 20 remain stable across generations, or if specific generations have general responses to ancestral 21diet. In the current study, we examined… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since high protein diet did not confer any change in the pupal size of the flies, but high carbohydrate diet resulted in smaller pupa (Reis, 2016), it is surprising to see pupal size difference upon protein restriction. This is in line with the results of Deas et al, 2019; that suggests more susceptibility of pupal mass change in poor diet than that of rich nutrient diet, in addition to exhibiting effects of parental and grandparental diet (Deas et al, 2019). Overall, our results also show that diet and generation have a differential role of different traits as suggested elsewhere (Deas et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since high protein diet did not confer any change in the pupal size of the flies, but high carbohydrate diet resulted in smaller pupa (Reis, 2016), it is surprising to see pupal size difference upon protein restriction. This is in line with the results of Deas et al, 2019; that suggests more susceptibility of pupal mass change in poor diet than that of rich nutrient diet, in addition to exhibiting effects of parental and grandparental diet (Deas et al, 2019). Overall, our results also show that diet and generation have a differential role of different traits as suggested elsewhere (Deas et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This is in line with the results of Deas et al, 2019; that suggests more susceptibility of pupal mass change in poor diet than that of rich nutrient diet, in addition to exhibiting effects of parental and grandparental diet (Deas et al, 2019). Overall, our results also show that diet and generation have a differential role of different traits as suggested elsewhere (Deas et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DNA methylation, histone acetylation) (Xia & de Belle, 2016). The phrase "transgenerational epigenetic inheritance" was used by Deas and colleagues to mark heritable changes in gene expression that occur without a change in DNA sequence (Deas et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the advantages that it offers for understanding mechanisms of inheritance have not been commensurately leveraged to explore the inheritance of acquired traits. A few notable exceptions include early studies showing that transcriptional profiles induced by exposing flies to a drug could be observed again in progeny that was not exposed to the same drug (Sharma & Singh, 2009) and numerous studies showing that diet quality in ancestral generations can alter diverse life‐history traits in later generations (such as egg and pupa size, wing length, longevity, fecundity, and predisposition to obesity and metabolic disorders in response to high caloric diets) (Buescher et al, 2013; Deas et al, 2019; Dew‐Budd et al, 2016; Xia & de Belle, 2016). However, studies that specifically address the inheritance of drug tolerance in Drosophila are noticeably lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%