It is firmly believed that ancestral primates were nocturnal, with nocturnality having been maintained in most prosimian lineages. Under this traditional view, the opsin genes in all nocturnal prosimians should have undergone similar degrees of functional relaxation and accumulated similar extents of deleterious mutations. This expectation is rejected by the short-wavelength (S) opsin gene sequences from 14 representative prosimians. We found severe defects of the S opsin gene only in lorisiforms, but no defect in five nocturnal and two diurnal lemur species and only minor defects in two tarsiers and two nocturnal lemurs. Further, the nonsynonymous-to-synonymous rate ratio of the S opsin gene is highest in the lorisiforms and varies among the other prosimian branches, indicating different time periods of functional relaxation among lineages. These observations suggest that the ancestral primates were diurnal or cathemeral and that nocturnality has evolved several times in the prosimians, first in the lorisiforms but much later in other lineages. This view is further supported by the distribution pattern of the middle-wavelength (M) and longwavelength (L) opsin genes among prosimians.T he traditional view of primate evolution (Fig. 1A) holds that the last common ancestor of living primates was nocturnal and that nocturnality has continued uninterrupted in most prosimian lineages. There are three major arguments for this view. First, the vast majority of extant prosimians are nocturnal. Therefore, the two lemuriform families, Indridae (sifakas) and Lemuridae (true lemurs), are assumed to have become either diurnal or cathemeral only in recent times. Second, the tapetum lucidum, which is a reflecting layer that enhances the ability of the eye to collect light, is found in many strepsirrhines, including some diurnal ones (1). This observation has been taken as evidence that the common ancestor of strepsirrhines had a tapetum and was, therefore, nocturnal. Third, the orbital convergence that is diagnostic of the primate clade is believed to be the result of a nocturnal visualpredator lifestyle (2). Paleontological data, however, are not conclusive about the lifestyle of early primates and suggest the existence of both nocturnal and diurnal forms (3).To explore this issue, we study the opsin genes in prosimians. It is well known that under nocturnality either the short-wavelength (S) or middle-͞long-wavelength (M͞L) opsin will experience relaxed selective constraints and may thus become nonfunctional. Indeed, a nonfunctional S opsin has been found in many nocturnal mammals (4-9). For example, the loss of the S opsin in the raccoon and the kinkajou might have occurred rather quickly because their close diurnal relative, the coati (5, 6), has a functional S opsin. Such a quick loss also is found in Aotus, the only nocturnal simian genus. Aotus diverged from its closest diurnal relatives, the callitrichines (marmosets and tamarins), only Ϸ13-15 million years ago (10). Yet, molecular studies indicate that the loss of the ...