2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocm.2020.100264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anchoring on visual cues in a stated preference survey: The case of siting offshore wind power projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Admittedly, there is a growing research literature on social acceptance for offshore wind energy, and most of these studies address the various impacts of siting decisions. This research supports the contention that offshore wind energy facilities are often (but not always [6]) preferred over nearshore and onshore production facilities [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], and that locations farther off the coast are often (but not always [15]) preferred to locations closer to the coast for offshore production facilities [9,10,[16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Admittedly, there is a growing research literature on social acceptance for offshore wind energy, and most of these studies address the various impacts of siting decisions. This research supports the contention that offshore wind energy facilities are often (but not always [6]) preferred over nearshore and onshore production facilities [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], and that locations farther off the coast are often (but not always [15]) preferred to locations closer to the coast for offshore production facilities [9,10,[16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…A set of other DCEs have established the visual or environmental disamenity effect of offshore wind energy at different distances from the shore, all else equal. These studies revealed a preference for moving wind energy projects from nearshore to offshore locations [9,10,[17][18][19][20], although the preferences are context specific and may be insignificant and/or vary across individuals [15]. For example, Ladenburg and Dubgaard [19,20] conducted a DCE on Danish residents.…”
Section: Discrete Choice Experiments (Dces)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For which, this study considered 2 holdouts for the respondents to answer. The results showed a high level of internal validity and consistency [ 28 , 57 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with the first attribute considered about the efficacy. Among the brands, Pfizer and Moderna had the highest efficacy rates of 95% and 94.7%, respectively [ 57 , 58 ]. In addition, Terry [ 59 ] showed that AstraZeneca had an efficacy rate of 70%, Johnsons and Johnsons with 72%, and Sinovac having 50.38%–91.25% on different clinical trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, anchors are provided in the form of numbers. However, anchors can also have an effect when provided through visuals [30].…”
Section: Anchoring Effects: Environmental Judgments Temperature Ancho...mentioning
confidence: 99%