2001
DOI: 10.1038/35072071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ancient DNA

Abstract: DNA that has been recovered from archaeological and palaeontological remains makes it possible to go back in time and study the genetic relationships of extinct organisms to their contemporary relatives. This provides a new perspective on the evolution of organisms and DNA sequences. However, the field is fraught with technical pitfalls and needs stringent criteria to ensure the reliability of results, particularly when human remains are studied.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
609
1
16

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 799 publications
(633 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
7
609
1
16
Order By: Relevance
“…[24][25][26] Thus, the extraction of DNA and set-up of the PCR were done in a positive pressure, sterile chamber, which was physically separated from the laboratory where the post-PCR processes are usually carried out. All of the working surfaces were regularly cleaned with sodium hypochlorite and were, in addition, regularly irradiated with UV light.…”
Section: Samples and Extraction Of Dnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24][25][26] Thus, the extraction of DNA and set-up of the PCR were done in a positive pressure, sterile chamber, which was physically separated from the laboratory where the post-PCR processes are usually carried out. All of the working surfaces were regularly cleaned with sodium hypochlorite and were, in addition, regularly irradiated with UV light.…”
Section: Samples and Extraction Of Dnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These discrepancies might indicate that the samples analyzed were actually contaminated with non-authentic DNA. As contamination is indeed always possible when dealing with samples with high DNA degradation, 11,12,53 contamination cannot be excluded here, especially for the head as the first attempt to collect DNA from the sample was not successful. 21 Alternatively, they would support the hypothesis that the French kings were not the donors of these biological samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10 The main drawback of the genetic identification of presumptive remains from historical figures is that the DNA within these samples is often degraded and that DNA contamination can mask the original DNA of the person. 11,12 When the person and his or her close relatives died a long time ago, good quality DNA as reference material is usually not available, whereas this is rarely the case in forensic cases. Nevertheless, validation of the data remains essential to confirm the results of the genetic identification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, results should be interpreted cautiously considering that mtDNA represents a few genetic loci that might or not might reflect the overall history of the genome (Hofreiter et al. 2001). Although ancient DNA is a powerful tool, further explorations of populations dynamics related to glacial events (e. g. Dalén et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2007) should also be explored using nuclear DNA sequences, morphological data (Hofreiter et al. 2001; Leonard 2008), and/or a habitat suitability approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%