We read with enthusiasm the recent paper by , in which the authors retrieved and analyzed two mitogenomes from ancient Patagonians, an endeavor accomplished entirely with all the experimental and analytical procedures conducted in Argentina, as in their previous work (Arencibia, Muñoz Hidalgo, et al., 2023). However, we respectfully disagree with the results of their phylogenetic analysis, as well as with their conclusions, concerning the genetic connections with other South American regions.On one hand, we concur with Arencibia and co-workers that the SAC 1-1-3 haplotype shows no clear affiliations to any other haplotype in the database employed, although this fact may reflect more of the database's incompleteness than the absence of putatively related lineages: SAC 1-1-3 shares one of its six coding polymorphisms, 6040G, with the modern Uruguayan sample MW057683 (Figueiro et al., 2022). Both samples also share T57C, but this change should be considered homoplasic given that, in the Uruguayan case, it appears as part of the mini-haplotype 55.1T-57C-59C that tends to be inher-