“…However, the excess buoyancy of the actively upwelling mantle under most OIB locations may, in part, derive from its residual nature (e.g., Matthews et al., 2016, 2021; Shorttle et al., 2014, 2020; Stracke et al., 2019), that is, the upwelling mantle contains a large proportion of mantle that has previously been melted and has thus become very incompatible element depleted, but also less dense (e.g., Afonso and Schutt, 2012; Schutt and Lesher, 2006). Such residual mantle can still produce considerable amounts of melts (e.g., Byerly and Lassiter, 2014; Sanfilippo et al., 2021), because incompatible elements are almost quantitatively extracted for small extents of melts exctraction (∼1–5%), but it takes up to 20% of melt etxration to exhaust clinopyroxene, and thus considerably lower melt producitivity (e.g., Asimow et al., 1997). Hence residual mantle contributes little to the incompatible element budget, and therefore to the Sr‐Nd‐Hf‐Pb isotope ratios of the erupted melts, which are a weighted average of melts from all source constituents (e.g., Rudge et al., 2013; Stracke, 2021a, 2021b; Stracke and Bourdon, 2009; Stracke et al., 2011; Willig et al., 2020).…”