2004
DOI: 10.1214/088342304000000323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ancillaries and Conditional Inference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This appears in discussions of ancillarity by Fisher (1956), Basu (1964), Fraser (1979) and Fraser (2004) and has the unusual feature that the row totals and column totals are each ancillary statistics for θ but the combination of them is not ancillary. The construction below however is conditional on an approximate ancillary statistic that is not needed explicitly.…”
Section: × 2 Tablesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This appears in discussions of ancillarity by Fisher (1956), Basu (1964), Fraser (1979) and Fraser (2004) and has the unusual feature that the row totals and column totals are each ancillary statistics for θ but the combination of them is not ancillary. The construction below however is conditional on an approximate ancillary statistic that is not needed explicitly.…”
Section: × 2 Tablesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Given the ubiquity of recognizable subsets (Buehler and Feddersen, 1963;Bondar, 1977), this strategy uses pre-data confidence as an approximation to post-data confidence in the sense in which expected Fisher information approximates observed Fisher information (Efron and Hinkley, 1978), aiming not at exact inference but at a pragmatic use of the limited resources available for any particular data analysis. Certain situations may instead call for careful applications of conditional inference (Goutis and Casella, 1995;Sundberg, 2003;Fraser, 2004) or of minimum description length (Bickel, 2011b) for basing decisions more directly on the data actually observed.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , V n in (7) are d ×1 vectors that are tangent to the ancillary statistic and that show how changing the parameter θ changes y (Fraser 2004); we discuss them further below. Expression (6), which is appreciably easier to deal with than the somewhat forbidding expression (5), shows that in order to compute ϕ(θ) we require the expected information matrix and the score statistic, and the derivatives of the latter and of the log-likelihood with respect to the observation.…”
Section: Computation Of ϕ(θ)mentioning
confidence: 99%