2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.fss.2007.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

- and R-implications: A state-of-the-art survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the operations constructed in this way are in general non-functionally expressible implication functions. To see this, let us recall that an implication function I is said to satisfy the leftneutrality principle 1 , whenever…”
Section: Proposition 4 Let F G Be Aggregation Functions I An Implicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the operations constructed in this way are in general non-functionally expressible implication functions. To see this, let us recall that an implication function I is said to satisfy the leftneutrality principle 1 , whenever…”
Section: Proposition 4 Let F G Be Aggregation Functions I An Implicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characterization of t-norms, which residuals satisfy the ordering property (OP) have been obtained by Baczyński and Jayaram [2]. …”
Section: A First Characterization Of R-implications Generated From Lementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coimplication functions are conceived as N -dual structures of implication functions extending the classical (co)implications [19,20,21,9,32] and [3]: Since Definition 6 imposes a very weak condition for a binary function to be a fuzzy (co)implication, several other extra properties are considered in the literature in addition to (J1) I1. The most used ones are listed below: …”
Section: Fuzzy (Co)implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%