2017
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.95.062118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anderson localization in the non-Hermitian Aubry-André-Harper model with physical gain and loss

Abstract: We investigate the Anderson localization in non-Hermitian Aubry-André-Harper (AAH) models with imaginary potentials added to lattice sites to represent the physical gain and loss during the interacting processes between the system and environment. By checking the mean inverse participation ratio (MIPR) of the system, we find that different configurations of physical gain and loss have very different impacts on the localization phase transition in the system. In the case with balanced physical gain and loss add… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Upon increasing L, the finite-size energy gap decreases from a purely real number to zero, at a certain L the imaginary part is developed and reaches a constant value 2γ x as indicated by Eq. (19). The result is quite similar to that in the non-Hermitian SSH model with only γ z [Sec.…”
Section: Non-hermitian Chern Insulator Modelsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Upon increasing L, the finite-size energy gap decreases from a purely real number to zero, at a certain L the imaginary part is developed and reaches a constant value 2γ x as indicated by Eq. (19). The result is quite similar to that in the non-Hermitian SSH model with only γ z [Sec.…”
Section: Non-hermitian Chern Insulator Modelsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…On the other hand, for real-energy on-site potential disorder a non-Hermitian delocalization transition is observed * stefano.longhi@polimi.it by application of an imaginary gauge field (Hatano-Nelson-Anderson model [23-26, 29, 33, 39, 46, 47, 49]). Other studies focused on several non-Hermitian extensions of diagonal or off-diagonal AAH models [31, 35-37, 40, 41, 43, 44, 47-50], with either commensurate or incommensurate potential, showing the impact of non-Hermiticity terms in the Hamiltonian on edge states and parity-time (PT ) symmetry breaking [35-37, 41, 43], on the Hofstadter butterfly spectrum [36], and on the localization properties of eigenstates [43,44,[47][48][49][50]. Recently, the topological nature of a metal-insulator phase transition found in an incommensurate PT -symmetric AAH model has been revealed [48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Hermitian case, the AAH Hamiltonian is topologically nontrivial because it can be mapped into a two-dimensional quantum Hall system on a square lattice [47][48][49][50]. A few recent studies have considered some non-Hermitian extensions of the AAH model [51][52][53][54][55][56], mainly with a commensurate potential and with open boundary conditions. Such numerical studies investigated how gain and loss distributions affect edge states and parity-time (PT ) symmetry breaking [51][52][53]55], the Hofstadter butterfly spectrum [52], and the localization properties of eigenstates [54,56].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%