2018
DOI: 10.1039/c8ob01505h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Androsterone-based gels enable diastereospecific reductions and diastereoselective epoxidations of gelators

Abstract: Eleven new androsterone-based gelators were synthesized, and their gelation properties and gel-mediated reactions were investigated. The relationships between the structures, gelation and self-assembly processes of the gelators are discussed. By using granular PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene) as costirrers, quantitative and diastereospecific reductions of the gelator carbonyl groups mediated by water were achieved in the gels of seven gelators. This reduction did not occur in the control experiment which used or… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, discrepant yields were achieved for these steroidal derivatives, suggesting different reactivity considering the substituent present at C-16 (the aromatic group). Relative to structural characterization, with the exception of epoxide 15 [ 25 ], steroidal epoxides 16 – 27 are new synthetic molecules, and respective high resolution mass spectral acquisition (HRMS) was mandatory, as well as IR and 13 C NMR spectra (data available on Supplementary Material, S1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, discrepant yields were achieved for these steroidal derivatives, suggesting different reactivity considering the substituent present at C-16 (the aromatic group). Relative to structural characterization, with the exception of epoxide 15 [ 25 ], steroidal epoxides 16 – 27 are new synthetic molecules, and respective high resolution mass spectral acquisition (HRMS) was mandatory, as well as IR and 13 C NMR spectra (data available on Supplementary Material, S1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 H NMR (CDCl 3 400.13 MHz) δ: 7.51 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.42–7.32 (4H, m), 3.94–3.84 (1H, m), 2.95 (1H, d, J = 4.4 Hz), 2.85 (1H, dd, J = 16.1, 6.4 Hz), 1.11 (3H, s), and 0.90 (3H, s). 13 C NMR (CDCl 3 101.62 MHz) δ: 209.20, 135.58, 135.28, 130.33, 129.30, 128.71, 68.57, 65.87, 65.69, 58.70, 49.95, 47.41, 42.84, 39.76, 35.14, 32.37, 31.20, 31.07, 29.24, 27.90, 20.06, 15.99, 15.29, 14.28 [ 25 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%