Transformationen Des Kulturellen 2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-531-19239-0_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aneignung von Kultur. Wege zu kultureller Teilhabe und zur Musik

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therein, 25% of teenagers with a higher socio-economic status played music, but only 12% from the lower and 14% from the middle class 2 . In addition, MA of younger individuals seems to depend on the educational status and income of their parents 45 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therein, 25% of teenagers with a higher socio-economic status played music, but only 12% from the lower and 14% from the middle class 2 . In addition, MA of younger individuals seems to depend on the educational status and income of their parents 45 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those few exceptions are the studies of Sander et al (2021), which investigated leisure activities in general (and musical activities as a part of those) as a driver of personality development, and a study by Kröner et al (2008), which discusses the direction of the causal relationships between cultural activities and openness in a longitudinal design with two measurements. The strong relationship between openness and musical participation has been shown generally for children and young adults (Corrigall et al, 2013;Lehmann-Wermser & Krupp-Schleußner, 2017;Krause et al, 2021) with respect to highbrow cultural activities (Kröner et al, 2008) and participation in music across the lifespan (Krause et al, 2021;Sander et al, 2021). In this case, openness is mostly seen as a predictor for cultural activities.…”
Section: Research On Musical Participation and Personality Developmentmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Je erfolgreicher eine Gesellschaft darin ist, möglichst viele Personen dazu zu befähigen, ihre individuellen Ziele im Rahmen der sozial gültigen Normen und Wertevorstellungen zu verwirklichen, als desto gerechter kann diese bezeichnet werden. Dabei geht es explizit nicht um eine Art neoliberales Paradigma der Eigenverantwortlichkeit, welches impliziert, dass jede Person selbst dafür verantwortlich ist, was sie unter der Bedingung von Chancengleichheit aus ihren Chancen macht (Lehmann-Wermser & Krupp-Schleußner, 2014). Sen postuliert stattdessen, dass mit einem hohen Maß an individueller capability auch ein hohes Maß an Verantwortung für Schwächere einhergehe: Wer mehr capability und damit mehr Macht besitzt als andere, trägt Schwächeren gegenüber eine Verantwortung , die sich aus eben dieser Asymmetrie ergibt.…”
Section: Well-beingunclassified