SUMmARY Data from the Finnish Register of Congenital Malformations for the years 1965-73 were used in a search for associations between environmental influences and defects of the central nervous system (CNS). The material consisted of 710 cases of CNS defects and their matched-pair controls. Moreover, an 'internal' control group of 259 cases of polydactyly and their matched-pair controls were used. The first report gives information on variations in time and space, sex distribution, and parental age. A higher incidence of anencephaly was noted in the eastern part of the country, but no significant secular or seasonal variations were found. The sex ratio (M/F) was lower than expected in the groups of anencephaly and CNS defects as a whole. High parental age turned out to be a risk factor in the group of all CNS defects, mainly owing to the subgroup of hydrocephaly. The dangers of observational studies due to confounding factors are discussed.Defects of the central nervous system (CNS) constitute an important medical as well as a social problem which like most congenital defects are likely to be caused by an interaction of both genetic and environmental factors. The purpose of this study is to test some hypotheses concerning the association of environmental factors with CNS defects. This first report gives a description of the material, with information on incidence, seasonal and yearly variations, sex distribution, and parental age. Subsequent reports will deal more specifically with various maternal and exogenous factors associated with CNS defects.
Material and methodsThis epidemiological study is based on material from the Finnish Register of Congenital Malformations. Reporting of all congenital malformations detected during the first year of life was made compulsory in Finland in 1963, the year in which the register was founded. The group of CNS defects is one of the 'detector' defects, for which extensive information is collected through the maternity welfare centres. The control for each case is the mother whose delivery preceded that of the study mother in the same maternity welfare district. The information on both the study and the control cases is collected by interviews with the mothers and from the records of the welfare centres obtained during pregnancy. Thus the information is prospective as well as retrospective. Full details of the organisation of the register have been published elsewhere (Sax6n et al., 1974