1998
DOI: 10.1016/s1383-5742(97)00029-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aneuploidy: a report of an ECETOC task force

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
57
1
17

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 168 publications
1
57
1
17
Order By: Relevance
“…The incorporation of the nanotubes into the centrosomal structure as well as the integration of the carbon nanotubes with the microtubules in the mitotic spindle may exert physical forces that fragment the centrosome, disrupt the mitotic spindle, and induce errors in chromosome number that are possible at the current levels of exposure. Centrosome fragmentation, mitotic spindle disruption, and aneuploidy are characteristics of cancer cells and may lead to an increased risk of cancer [23,25]. Consistent with this hypothesis, research with inorganic fibers indicate that in vivo asbestos-induced mesothelioma is correlated with the ability of the fiber to cause chromosomal missegregation, not with cytotoxicity [81].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The incorporation of the nanotubes into the centrosomal structure as well as the integration of the carbon nanotubes with the microtubules in the mitotic spindle may exert physical forces that fragment the centrosome, disrupt the mitotic spindle, and induce errors in chromosome number that are possible at the current levels of exposure. Centrosome fragmentation, mitotic spindle disruption, and aneuploidy are characteristics of cancer cells and may lead to an increased risk of cancer [23,25]. Consistent with this hypothesis, research with inorganic fibers indicate that in vivo asbestos-induced mesothelioma is correlated with the ability of the fiber to cause chromosomal missegregation, not with cytotoxicity [81].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Exposure of rodents to the larger diameter MWCNT (11.3 nm) results in micronuclei in Type II epithelial cells indicating either a high level of chromosomal breakage or mitotic spindle disruption [2]. The integrity of the mitotic spindle and chromosome number are critical because mitotic spindle disruption, centrosome damage and aneuploidy may lead to a greater risk of cancer [23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3n, 4n) is termed polyploidy, triploidy and tetraploidy, respectively. In distinction from mammals, where triploidy is usually associated with lethal to sublethal conditions (Gold and Avise, 1976;Aardema et al, 1998), in lower vertebrates, triploids are more viable and have been observed in hybrids between unisexual and bisexual species of fish, amphibians and reptiles (Thorgaard and Gall, 1979). Interest in the potential use of triploids in fish culture has been based on the assumption that these fish are in general sterile.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Nersesyan et al, 2006) concluded that females with PCOS have increased chromosomal aberrations (CAs) level in lymphocytes which is a sign of genetic instability. There is a hypothesis that micronuclei and chromosomal aberrations could have a predictive value for cancer and therefore substitute chromosomal aberrations as cancer risk biomarkers (Aardema et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings suggest that there is genetic instability in peripheral blood lymphocytes of women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. There is a hypothesis that micronuclei and chromosomal aberrations could have a predictive value for cancer and therefore substitute chromosomal aberrations as cancer risk biomarkers (Aardema et al, 1998). Women with PCOS have a nearly 3 times increased risk for developing endometrial cancer, the association between PCOS and endometrial cancer involves prolonged endometrial exposure to unopposed estrogen by cyclic progesterone due to anovulation (Tokmak et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%