Abstract-Angiotensin (Ang) II-infused hypertensive rats exhibit increases in renal angiotensinogen mRNA and protein, as well as urinary angiotensinogen excretion in association with increased intrarenal Ang II content. The present study was performed to determine if the augmentation of intrarenal angiotensinogen requires activation of Ang II type 1 (AT 1 ) receptors. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (200 to 220 g) were divided into 3 groups: sham surgery (nϭ10), subcutaneous infusion of Ang II (80 ng/min, nϭ11), and Ang II infusion plus AT 1 blocker (ARB), olmesartan (5 mg/d, nϭ12). Ang II infusion progressively increased systolic blood pressure (SBP) compared with sham (178Ϯ8 mm Hg versus119Ϯ4 at day 11). ARB treatment prevented hypertension (113Ϯ6 at day 11). Twenty-four-hour urine collections were taken at day 12, and plasma and tissue samples were harvested at day 13. The Ang IIϩARB group had a significant increase in plasma Ang II compared with Ang II and sham groups (365Ϯ46 fmol/mL versus 76Ϯ9 and 45Ϯ14, respectively). Nevertheless, ARB treatment markedly limited the enhancement of kidney Ang II by Ang II infusion (65Ϯ17 fmol/g in sham, 606Ϯ147 in Ang II group, and 288Ϯ28 in Ang IIϩARB group). Ang II infusion significantly increased kidney angiotensinogen compared with sham (1.69Ϯ0.21 densitometric units versus 1.00Ϯ0.17). This change was reflected by increased angiotensinogen immunostaining in proximal tubules. ARB treatment prevented this increase (1.14Ϯ0.12). Urinary angiotensinogen excretion rates were enhanced 4.7ϫ in Ang II group (4.67Ϯ0.41 densitometric units versus 1.00Ϯ0.21) but ARB treatment prevented the augmentation of urinary angiotensinogen (0.96Ϯ0.23). These data demonstrate that augmentation of intrarenal angiotensinogen in Ang II-infused rats is AT 1 -dependent and provide further evidence that urinary angiotensinogen is closely linked to intrarenal Ang II in Ang II-dependent hypertension. Key Words: angiotensin II Ⅲ angiotensinogen Ⅲ receptors, angiotensin II Ⅲ rats Ⅲ kidney A ngiotensin II (Ang II) plays an important role in proximal tubular reabsorptive function primarily via activation of Ang II type 1 (AT 1 ) receptor at both basolateral and luminal membranes. 1 Although some Ang II type 2 receptors have been confirmed on proximal tubules, 2 most functional studies suggest that the major effects of Ang II on proximal tubules are via AT 1 receptors. 3 Several studies have suggested that Ang II also plays an important role in the regulation of distal tubular reabsorption rate. 4 This effect was blocked by either saralasin or losartan, indicating that this stimulation involves AT 1 receptor activation. 4 These findings, together with the demonstration that AT 1 receptor is present on the luminal membranes of distal nephron segments, 5,6 suggest that luminal Ang II plays an important role in the regulation not only of proximal reabsorption rate but also of distal tubular reabsorptive function. 7 Studies in isolated proximal tubular cells showed that Ang II stimulates Na ϩ /H ϩ exchanger via AT 1 ...