2016
DOI: 10.17159/2413-3108/2010/v0i34a871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anger, hatred, or just heartlessness? Defining gratuitous violence

Abstract: Violent crime in South Africa is sometimes said to be unusual, because it is perceived to frequently be gratuitous. This article engages with the question of how to define gratuitous violence. If the term gratuitous is understood to mean 'for nothing', gratuitous violence should be understood as violence that is 'low on expressive and instrumental motivations'. Whilst the evidence is that much violence is 'instrumental', violence in South Africa may be unusual but it may be better to articulate this in terms o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This line of inquiry requires further investigation. See Bruce (2010) for a discussion of the definitional complexity of gratuitous violence in the context of South Africa.…”
Section: Conclusion: Social Death Futurity and Repairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This line of inquiry requires further investigation. See Bruce (2010) for a discussion of the definitional complexity of gratuitous violence in the context of South Africa.…”
Section: Conclusion: Social Death Futurity and Repairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding these processes means that psychologists need to account for process factors and their important correlates to complement injury outcome data. One important correlate is the degree of violence exercised in incidents (Bruce, 2010), a seemingly measurable and obviously differentiable dimension of violence that at least chronologically is located between intention and injury in acts of violence. In public health terms, the degree of violence is associated with the nature and severity of the injury outcome measured, for example, by an injury severity score (Sleet et al, 2011).…”
Section: Rethinking Typologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%