2014
DOI: 10.1177/0265407514552617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anger in families

Abstract: We addressed three questions about anger in the family, including the derivation of anger, the presence of anger contagion, and the degree to which family members share perceptions about anger in the family. Seventh-grade children, mothers, and fathers independently reported on the frequency and intensity of anger in six family relationships (child to mother, mother to child, child to father, father to child, mother to father, and father to mother). Analyses based on the social relations model revealed that fa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Misinterpretations about children’s anger (e.g., perceiving anger when it does not exist) can be highly problematic in two ways. Anger is emotionally contagious in multiple types of settings (Elfenbein, 2014; Halberstadt, Beale, Meade, Craig, & Parker, 2015) and a cascading effect from incorrectly perceived anger to teachers becoming angry themselves, resulting in truly angry students is not an unlikely consequence (Becker, Goetz, Morger, & Ranellucci, 2014). Further, because perceived anger (even if misinterpreted) can evoke punishment as well as anger (Côté-Lussier, 2013), teachers’ misperception of anger may also lead to adverse consequences such as undeserved interruptions from learning (e.g., time outs or suspensions).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Misinterpretations about children’s anger (e.g., perceiving anger when it does not exist) can be highly problematic in two ways. Anger is emotionally contagious in multiple types of settings (Elfenbein, 2014; Halberstadt, Beale, Meade, Craig, & Parker, 2015) and a cascading effect from incorrectly perceived anger to teachers becoming angry themselves, resulting in truly angry students is not an unlikely consequence (Becker, Goetz, Morger, & Ranellucci, 2014). Further, because perceived anger (even if misinterpreted) can evoke punishment as well as anger (Côté-Lussier, 2013), teachers’ misperception of anger may also lead to adverse consequences such as undeserved interruptions from learning (e.g., time outs or suspensions).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the SRM partitions the variance to include group-level effects, relationship-level effects for individuals within the group, and individual-level actor and partner effects. In using the SRM, researchers have increased our understanding of some unique dimensions of close relationships (Eichelsheim, Deković, Buist, & Cook, 2009;Halberstadt, Beale, Meade, Craig, & Parker, 2015). Given many researchers' unfamiliarity with the SRM and data structure considerations (e.g., multiple measures of the construct of interest), a full SRM analysis is not always possible or desirable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Negative emotional states in fathers may be related to children’s behavioral adjustment by perpetuating interparental conflict. For instance, anger tends to initiate emotional contagion in family members, which may prime destructive interpersonal conflicts (Halberstadt et al, 2015). Against the backdrop of interparental conflict, children are at an elevated risk of internalizing and externalizing problems (El-Sheikh et al, 2019).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%