“…In addition, visual SENC improved sensitivity for CAD detection compared to WMA, while specificity was slightly lower, and a nonsignificant trend for higher accuracy was observed. The slightly lower specificity of SENC for ischemia detection may partially be attributed to induction of myocardial ischemia detectable by SENC: 1) in myocardial regions supplied by mildly stenotic vessels (e.g., 40% to 50%), which were classified as nonischemic by the predefined angiographic criteria (5,6); or 2) in myocardial segments with microvascular impairment in the absence of coronary lumen narrowing (29). Finally, our method comparison may suffer from a methodological mismatch, in that the assessment of wall motion that corresponds to radial myocardial function was assessed only visually, whereas SENC, which characterizes circumferential and longitudinal shortening, was assessed both visually and quantitatively.…”