2008
DOI: 10.1186/1532-429x-10-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angiographic correlations of patients with small vessel disease diagnosed by adenosine-stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) with adenosine-stress myocardial perfusion is gaining importance for the detection and quantification of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, there is little knowledge about patients with CMR-detected ischemia, but having no relevant stenosis as seen on coronary angiography (CA). The aims of our study were to characterize these patients by CMR and CA and evaluate correlations and potential reasons for the ischemic findings. 73 patients with an indication for CA were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CMR results have been correlated with coronary angiography results in patients without SLE, but not yet in SLE patients (26). In addition to further validation testing with masked readings in SLE patients, CMR techniques will need additional standardization procedures for reproducibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…CMR results have been correlated with coronary angiography results in patients without SLE, but not yet in SLE patients (26). In addition to further validation testing with masked readings in SLE patients, CMR techniques will need additional standardization procedures for reproducibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…183 This was later validated in additional studies (46 women among 73 patients and 22 women among 34 patients). 184,185 In women with acute coronary syndrome and normal coronary arteries, subendocardial ischemia on CMR was a common finding. 186 As noted previously, in studies comparing CMR with invasive angiography, it is the minority of patients who undergo invasive angiography, and posttest referral bias elevates diagnostic sensitivity and may reduce specificity.…”
Section: Role Of Cmr In the Diagnosis And Risk Assessment Of Women DImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, visual SENC improved sensitivity for CAD detection compared to WMA, while specificity was slightly lower, and a nonsignificant trend for higher accuracy was observed. The slightly lower specificity of SENC for ischemia detection may partially be attributed to induction of myocardial ischemia detectable by SENC: 1) in myocardial regions supplied by mildly stenotic vessels (e.g., 40% to 50%), which were classified as nonischemic by the predefined angiographic criteria (5,6); or 2) in myocardial segments with microvascular impairment in the absence of coronary lumen narrowing (29). Finally, our method comparison may suffer from a methodological mismatch, in that the assessment of wall motion that corresponds to radial myocardial function was assessed only visually, whereas SENC, which characterizes circumferential and longitudinal shortening, was assessed both visually and quantitatively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%