2018
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.27481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angiographic follow‐up of infants and children undergoing percutaneous carotid artery interventions

Abstract: PCA access for pediatric interventional catheterization appears to be safe with a very low rate of mild stenosis, and very few complications. Follow-up outcomes in our series are excellent, with a CA patency rate of 100%, even after multiple procedures. Mild CA stenosis was not associated with patient size or sheath introducer caliber. While the acute results from percutaneous CA catheterization have proven safe in recent literature, longer-term outcomes remain unreported. At our institution, the outcomes foll… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What is not known at this time is the long‐term effects of vascular access from the CA. Addressing this clinical question, Ligon et al reviewed all patients with midterm follow‐up CA imaging following percutaneous CA access . They found very low rates of mid‐term CA problems following percutaneous CA access, including a 35% incidence of mild, clinically silent, CA stenosis with a median stenosis of 4.1% as defined as narrowest diameter compared to nominal diameter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is not known at this time is the long‐term effects of vascular access from the CA. Addressing this clinical question, Ligon et al reviewed all patients with midterm follow‐up CA imaging following percutaneous CA access . They found very low rates of mid‐term CA problems following percutaneous CA access, including a 35% incidence of mild, clinically silent, CA stenosis with a median stenosis of 4.1% as defined as narrowest diameter compared to nominal diameter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In small infants, the advancement of a 6 Fr long sheath from the femoral artery can be prohibitive and, more importantly, associated with serious complications and permanent pulse‐loss . In small case series, carotid‐artery access has been proposed as a possible alternative to femoral access with a low rate of complications . In particular, in patients with modified BT shunts, carotid access has the additional advantage of giving a straight pathway to access the shunt, making the delivery and manipulation of the stent technically less demanding .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In small case series, carotid‐artery access has been proposed as a possible alternative to femoral access with a low rate of complications . In particular, in patients with modified BT shunts, carotid access has the additional advantage of giving a straight pathway to access the shunt, making the delivery and manipulation of the stent technically less demanding . Therefore, in the smallest patient of the series, we elected to deliver the stent from the carotid artery to minimize the risk of injuring the femoral arteries, and we think that this approach should be taken into consideration for the management of patients with similar characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, adopting ultrasound guided arterial puncture technique, systemic anticoagulation, and careful selection of catheter size have significantly reduced the femoral puncture site complication risks (<5%) 97–99. Umbilical artery access and carotid puncture have also been reported with reasonably low complication risks in limited circumstances 87 100…”
Section: Pediatric Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%