1995
DOI: 10.1016/s1051-0443(95)71186-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angioplasty for the Treatment of Visceral Ischemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The long-term clinical success of our study (88% Å mean follow-up at 27 months) is similar to that of other investigators (63-100%, mean Å 77% for follow-up periods of 3-60 months) [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. The primary longterm clinical success is equal to that of surgery (50-100%, mean Å 84% for follow-up periods of 24-69 months) [2,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The long-term clinical success of our study (88% Å mean follow-up at 27 months) is similar to that of other investigators (63-100%, mean Å 77% for follow-up periods of 3-60 months) [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. The primary longterm clinical success is equal to that of surgery (50-100%, mean Å 84% for follow-up periods of 24-69 months) [2,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Our results on PTA of visceral arteries coincide with those of other investigators (Table 3) where the technical success rate in relation to the number of patients is 81% (range Å 25-100%), the technical success rate in relation to the number of lesions is 72% (range Å 30-89%), the initial clinical success rate is 96% (range Å 80-100%), the periprocedural mortality rate is 2% (range Å 0-13%), and the morbidity rate is 10% (range Å 0-25%) [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Such results compared with those carried out by surgery are encouraging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4, 5), therefore, has become a more acceptable approach for stenotic or occlusive lesions. The ideal morphology for endovascular treatment is a short stenosis (less than 2 cm) that is located near the ostia of the main splanchnic branches as demonstrated by initial technical success rates of 95% in ostial lesions and 78% in nonostial lesions [25,26]. Regarding patency of the endovascular therapy, a study following up 23 consecutive patients showed overall clinical success after 27 months in 88%.…”
Section: Endovascular Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we feel that embolization should be primarily attempted in patients with a nonruptured aneurysm when the vascular anatomy is suitable for selective catheterization because an arterial ligation or an aneurysm resection are not always feasible, and a major operation (i.e., a partial pancreatectomy) might be necessary [3,4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding unruptured aneurysms, recanalization of the celiac axis may decompress the collaterals and cause the aneurysm to disappear [2]. Thus, percutaneous balloon angioplasty [3,4] or stent placement [5,6] may be a preventive measure that should be tried before more invasive surgical procedures, if treatment is considered warranted in these patients and as long as there are no definite signs of a median arcuate ligament syndrome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%