1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.1992.tb02813.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angiotensin‐converting Enzyme Inhibition as First‐line Treatment for Hypertension

Abstract: 1. Perindopril (4 mg) was compared with atenolol (50 mg), captopril (25 mg b.d.) or a diuretic (hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg and amiloride 5 mg) in three studies involving a total of 503 hypertensive patients with a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of 95-125 mmHg.2. A 4 week single-blind placebo period preceded 12 weeks of active treatment. Dose titration was at weeks 4 and 8 if supine DBP >90 mmHg. The dose was doubled and if necessary a diuretic was added in the atenolol or captopril comparisons, and atenolol was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays, the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (e.g., Capoten (captopril), Vasotec (enalapril), Prinivil, or Zestril (lisinopril), etc.) have been considered as first-line drugs for the treatment of hypertension and myocardial infarction [ 5 , 6 ]. However, it was found that any single currently used ACE inhibitor cannot completely prevent and cure hypertension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (e.g., Capoten (captopril), Vasotec (enalapril), Prinivil, or Zestril (lisinopril), etc.) have been considered as first-line drugs for the treatment of hypertension and myocardial infarction [ 5 , 6 ]. However, it was found that any single currently used ACE inhibitor cannot completely prevent and cure hypertension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings caught our attention. We consulted the relevant literatures and found that it has been well reported that central administration of OT elicits strong scratching and grooming behaviors in rodents (Meisenberg and Simmons, 1982;Van Wimersma Greidanus et al, 1990;Thurston, 1992;Schorscher-Petcu et al, 2010;Yaksh et al, 2014). For example, intracerebroventricular injection of a high dose (1 nmol) of OT caused behavioral symptoms such as grooming, moving, foraging and squeaking (Delanoy et al, 1978).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been well documented that central administration of OT elicits strong scratching and grooming behaviors in rats (Van Wimersma Greidanus et al, 1990;Yaksh et al, 2014) and mice (Meisenberg and Simmons, 1982;Thurston, 1992;Schorscher-Petcu et al, 2010). When injected into the brain or spinal cord, OT at a dose of 1 nmol caused a behavioral syndrome characterized by grooming, moving, foraging, and squeaking in mice or rats (Delanoy et al, 1978;Yaksh et al, 2014), whereas a lower dose (<0.1 nmol) of OT produced scratching, rather than grooming, as the predominant symptom of behavioral arousal in mice (Meisenberg and Simmons, 1982;Schorscher-Petcu et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%