C ardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death among Canadian women. Hypertension is an established and prevalent risk factor for CVD, affecting more than one in five Canadian adults (1,2). In the Effect of Potentially Modifiable Risk Factors Associated with Myocardial Infarction in 52 Countries (INTERHEART) study (3), hypertension contributed to 29% of the population attributable risk for acute myocardial infarction in women compared with 15.9% with men, in part because the women were approximately one decade older. The prevalence of hypertension differs among men and women, as does the risk of CVD. Men develop clinically significant hypertension earlier, and among men 18 to 34 years of age, one in 10 are hypertensive compared with 2% of women; however, beyond 65 years of age, over 50% are hypertensive, and the prevalence of hypertension in women remains greater than in men (4).In addition to sex differences in epidemiology, there is evidence that there may be sex differences in the pathophysiology of hypertension. The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays a significant, if not central, role in the regulation of blood pressure (5,6). Endogenous sex hormones have been shown to interact with the RAS (Table 1). Androgens have been shown to upregulate the RAS and appear to produce an overall vasopressor effect (7). Estrogens, however, are in some way protective, with indirect evidence from an inverse relationship between the age of menopause and blood pressure (8). Also, the RAS is overall antagonized by estrogens (9). BACKGROUND: Clinical practice recommendations for hypertension do not make recommendations specific to men or women. However, the sex hormones appear to modulate differently the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), which plays a central role in the regulation of blood pressure. Today, little is known about the effects of sex on the efficacy of therapies that antagonize the RAS, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). OBJECTIVE: To identify randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of ACEIs and ARBs in preventing major cardiovascular outcomes, determine what proportion of the trial participants were female, and evaluate whether there was any evidence of a sex difference in the efficacy of these agents. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials that used either ACEIs or ARBs for the treatment of hypertension. RESULTS: Thirteen ACEI trials and nine ARB trials were identified. Sex-specific outcome data were available in six of the ACEI trials and three of the ARB trials. These trials enrolled 74,105 patients; 39.1% were women. Seven of the nine trials indicated that ACEIs or ARBs may be slightly more beneficial in men. The magnitude of these differences, in most trials, was small. CONCLUSIONS: Sex-specific data are reported in 43% of large hypertension clinical trials. Review of the trials reporting sex-specific effect sizes indicates that ACEIs and ARBs may be more eff...