2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.07.742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angiovac Use in Endocarditis During Pregnancy: A Novel Approach for Recurrent Debulking of Tricuspid Infective Vegetations in a 27-Year-Old Woman in Her 22nd and 26th Weeks of Pregnancy

Abstract: Infective endocarditis (IE) during pregnancy is a rare and life-threatening disease with maternal and fetal mortality rates as high as 33% and 29%, respectively. Intravenous (IV) antibiotics with or without surgical modalities are mainstays of treatment. The use of AngioVac offers a less invasive procedure for the removal of thrombi and emboli in patients with contraindications to surgery. While its use has not yet been reported or approved in pregnancy, we present a case where AngioVac was used for debulking … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Angiovac percutaneous vacuum‐assisted aspiration system has been successfully utilized to aspirate right sided (atrial, tricuspid valve or vena cava) vegetations, pulmonic valve vegetations, right atrial masses, vena cava thrombus, thrombus/vegetation of cardiac implantable electronic devices, and for aspiration of thoracic aortic mass 4–8 . Other case report and series of patients describing novel and unique use of AngioVac aspiration system in various patient subset ie; pregnant, congenital heart disease, inferior vena cava filter thrombosis and cancer related thrombosis are further listed in Table 1 9,10 . While there are no official guidelines for intended use, it is generally reserved for patients who are inoperable or at high/prohibitive surgical risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Angiovac percutaneous vacuum‐assisted aspiration system has been successfully utilized to aspirate right sided (atrial, tricuspid valve or vena cava) vegetations, pulmonic valve vegetations, right atrial masses, vena cava thrombus, thrombus/vegetation of cardiac implantable electronic devices, and for aspiration of thoracic aortic mass 4–8 . Other case report and series of patients describing novel and unique use of AngioVac aspiration system in various patient subset ie; pregnant, congenital heart disease, inferior vena cava filter thrombosis and cancer related thrombosis are further listed in Table 1 9,10 . While there are no official guidelines for intended use, it is generally reserved for patients who are inoperable or at high/prohibitive surgical risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7][8] Other case report and series of patients describing novel and unique use of AngioVac aspiration system in various patient subset ie; pregnant, congenital heart disease, inferior vena cava filter thrombosis and cancer related thrombosis are further listed in Table 1. 9,10 While there are no official guidelines for intended use, it is generally reserved for patients who are inoperable or at high/prohibitive surgical risk. The AngioVac system includes the AngioVac cannula, AngioVac circuit and is intended for use with other manufacturer's off-the shelf pump, filter, and reinfusion cannula requiring extracorporeal circulatory support for up to 6 h. There are two cannulas available with a 20°or 180°angled tip.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…marcescens and MSSA Yoruk et al, 2020 [21] 50/M IVDU, ICD MSSA endocarditis MSSA Souka et al, 2021 [22] 27/M IVDU, RE, TV replacement with bioprosthetic valve septic shock N/A Hamilton et al, 2021 [23] 35/F IVDU, RE Fever MRSA Kashyap et al 2021 [24] 39/F IVDU Nausea, Fever N/A ELJack et al, 2021 [25] 24/F IVDU, RE Hypotension S. aureus. E chang et al [26] 22/M N/A N/A MSSA 38/M N/A N/A MSSA 34/F N/A N/A MRSA Moriarty et al 2014 [27] 62/M ICD generalized fatigue and weakness E Faecalis Malviya et al 2016 [28] 35/M N/A septic shock MSSA 28/F IVDU septic shock MRSA 58/F IVDU, Bioprosthetic TV N/A E Faecalis Ayzenbart et al 2021 [29] 27/F IVDU Lower extremity edema, palpable purpura, dyspnea, fever MRSA Krishnan et al 2021 [30] 66/M PPM Severe lumbar back pain MSSA Hosoba et al 2015 [31] 67/M History of spinal osteomyelitis Infected breast implant, gluteal cellulitis …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… TV vegetation N/A Significant reduction of vegetation burden Stable on d/c TV and RVOT vegetation N/A Significant reduction of vegetation burden Stable on d/c Moriarty et al 2014 [27] Vegetation 4.76 × 2.1 cm and [LVEF] of 20%. LVEF of 20% & poor surgical candidate Successful removal Stable on d/c Malviya et al 2016 [28] 4.5-cm SVC mass N/A N/A No fatality reported TEE TV vegetations on the anterior and posterior leaflets N/A N/A No fatality reported 3.2 cm TV vegetation N/A N/A No fatality reported Ayzenbart et al 2021 [29] 2.4 × 1.2 cm and 1.4 × 0.7 cm TV masses Pregnant, septic shock and MOF Recurrence of vegetations Preeclampsia caused c-section at 33 weeks. Healthy newborn.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not recommended to perform surgery under 24 weeks of pregnancy, but to postpone it until 28 weeks of gestation due to the high risk of fetal death associated with insufficient growth [ 114 ]. Intravenous systems used with extracorporeal circulation for the removal of vegetation can be used as an alternative in the case of high-risk pregnancies [ 115 ].…”
Section: From Pathophysiology To Multidisciplinary Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%