2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angle bracket connections for CLT structures: Experimental characterization and numerical modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The complicated behaviour of the angle bracket connections has also been studied by numerical simulations. For example, a finite-element based model was developed to simulate angle bracket connections under combined axial-shear loading conditions (Schneider et al 2014), and was further validated against destructive test results of a different angle bracket type subjected to the same loading condition (Pozza et al 2017, Pozza et al 2018. Nailed hold-down connections are commonly used to provide uplifting restraints for CLT shear walls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complicated behaviour of the angle bracket connections has also been studied by numerical simulations. For example, a finite-element based model was developed to simulate angle bracket connections under combined axial-shear loading conditions (Schneider et al 2014), and was further validated against destructive test results of a different angle bracket type subjected to the same loading condition (Pozza et al 2017, Pozza et al 2018. Nailed hold-down connections are commonly used to provide uplifting restraints for CLT shear walls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the early 2000s, the first research studies were conducted to investigate the monotonic and quasi-static mechanical behavior of CLT diaphragm and their corresponding joints in Europe and later in North America (Ceccotti et al 2006;Follesa et al 2010;Hossain et al 2015;Reynolds et al 2017). The vast majority of studies have focused on hold down or bracket connections, which are mostly used in low-rise buildings (Flatscher et al 2014;Gavric et al 2011Gavric et al , 2015aLatour and Rizzano 2015;Mahdavifar et al 2018;Pozza et al 2018;Schneider et al 2013Schneider et al , 2015. Additional studies have investigated CLT shear connections such as SS, HL, BJ, and HL connections were found to exhibit a higher loading capacity and ductility compared to SS connections with the same fastener type, fastener spacing, and CLT species and layers (Sullivan et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steel angle brackets (for horizontal sliding forces) and hold-downs (for vertical uplift forces) are the most common types of such connectors (Tomasi and Smith, 2014). Considerable experimental and numerical studies have been conducted on the mechanical behaviour of angle bracket and hold-down systems (Casagrande et al, 2017(Casagrande et al, , 2016Gavric et al, 2015;Pozza et al, 2018;Tamagnone et al, 2018). Experimental analyses show that both tensile and shear strength of angle brackets are considerably high.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%