2004
DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nch130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angle dependence of response characteristics of neutron survey instruments

Abstract: Neutron area survey instruments are designed to have an approximately isotropic response. In practice, the response cannot be perfectly isotropic for instruments that do not have spherical symmetry, and for all instruments it is modified by the inclusion of batteries, electronics, handles, etc. This affects the ability of the survey instrument to measure accurately an isotropic dose equivalent quantity. Measurements of the angle dependence of response for four of the most commonly used designs of survey instru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same spherical moderator has been used with CR39 dosimeters and a 3 He proportional counter as a dual-detector extended-range rem counter (conventional, i.e. for non-pulsed fields) by Agosteo et al [18]. The only difference is the electrostatic shield that contains the detector and the polyethylene plug.…”
Section: Moderatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same spherical moderator has been used with CR39 dosimeters and a 3 He proportional counter as a dual-detector extended-range rem counter (conventional, i.e. for non-pulsed fields) by Agosteo et al [18]. The only difference is the electrostatic shield that contains the detector and the polyethylene plug.…”
Section: Moderatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fact explains part of the complexity of ambient dosimetry and of the limits of such instrumentation. Other known limitations associated to these instruments come from the angular dependence of their response (Roberts et al 2004, Tanner et al 2006 296 MeV of 35%. Similarly, the Wendi II detector was found in this work to respond within ±30% in neutron fields with strong high or low energy contributions (P9 and P6 points).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neutron reference dose was acquired with the Studsvik detector, placed in between the two moderators. Because the Studsvik does not have spherical symmetry, its response presents large angle dependency, more than 30% at 180°w ith respect to the reference direction (Roberts et al 2004). Since the angular dependence is lower with the angle about the detector central axis (within 10%), the instrument was placed in vertical position (figure 3(b)).…”
Section: Quantification Of the Impact Of The Use Of Standard Calibrat...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instruments with other geometries or equipped with important electronics (such as a photomultiplier, preamplifier near the detector, integrated electronics for displaying, etc) have, however, fluence or ambient-doseequivalent responses that vary with the neutron direction. This has been studied in detail for survey meters by [10,13,14], revealing response variations up to 50% as shown in figure 4.…”
Section: Angular Response Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dosimeter is placed at the centre of the front face of the phantom and this assembly is rotated to several angles with respect to the neutron beam direction. This study has to [14]. For the spherical detectors, the angle 0 • is the reference direction, that is, irradiation from the end opposite the electronics.…”
Section: Angular Response Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%