2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-46478-7_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angry Crowds: Detecting Violent Events in Videos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Anomaly detection is one of the most challenging and long standing problems in computer vision [39,38,7,10,5,20,43,27,26,28,42,18,26]. For video surveillance applications, there are several attempts to detect violence or aggression [15,25,11,30] Beyond violent and non-violent patterns discrimination, authors in [38,7] proposed to use tracking to model the normal motion of people and detect deviation from that normal motion as an anomaly. Due to difficulties in obtaining reliable tracks, several approaches avoid tracking and learn global motion patterns through histogram-based methods [10], topic modeling [20], motion patterns [31], social force models [29], mixtures of dynamic textures model [27], Hidden Markov Model (HMM) on local spatio-temporal volumes [26], and context-driven method [43].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anomaly detection is one of the most challenging and long standing problems in computer vision [39,38,7,10,5,20,43,27,26,28,42,18,26]. For video surveillance applications, there are several attempts to detect violence or aggression [15,25,11,30] Beyond violent and non-violent patterns discrimination, authors in [38,7] proposed to use tracking to model the normal motion of people and detect deviation from that normal motion as an anomaly. Due to difficulties in obtaining reliable tracks, several approaches avoid tracking and learn global motion patterns through histogram-based methods [10], topic modeling [20], motion patterns [31], social force models [29], mixtures of dynamic textures model [27], Hidden Markov Model (HMM) on local spatio-temporal volumes [26], and context-driven method [43].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ACC ± SD ROC-AUC STIP(HoG) + BoW [8], [9] 91.7 -STIP(HoF) + BoW [8], [9] 88.6 -MoSIFT + BoW [10] 90.9 -MoSIFT + KDE + SC [10] 94.0±1.97% 0. Method ACC ± SD ROC-AUC Jerk # [3] 95.02±0.56% -STIP (HoG) + BoW [8] 44.5% -STIP (HoF) + BoW [8] 50.5% -MoSIFT + BoW [8] 89.5% -VIF # [9] 91.31±1.06% -Interaction Force # [16] 95.51±0.79% -F L |F Cv [27] 96.89±0.21% -VIPS [25] 96 20% has been obtained. The classification result significantly benefits from the integration of the Lagrangian descriptors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further improvements were proposed by Xu et al [10] who substituted the bag-of-words step with a sparse coding scheme to encode MoSIFT features for violent video detection. A different approach has been proposed by Mohammadi et al with the Visual Information Processing Signature (VIPS) [25] feature. The VIPS is based on heuristic motion based rules that are related to acceleration, body compression and the aggressive drive in the video.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only few of them, though, are concerned with dangerous behaviors. These methods can be further divided into those detecting dangerous crowd behaviors, in which the individual motion is superseded by large flows as in [68,69,70,71], and those detecting closer dangerous human behaviors.…”
Section: Related Work and Datasets On Abnormal Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%