2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ångström–Prescott equation: Physical basis, empirical models and sensitivity analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
42
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Model 6 in Zone 1, Model 3 in Zones 2 and 3, Model 8 in Zones 4 and 5, and Model 5 in Zone 6 performed best, with all these models taking altitude into account, which implies that altitude was the main factor determining the A‐P parameters in most regions. Our results concurred with those of Paulescu et al (), which demonstrated that altitude is a mandatory input variable to the A‐P model. De Souza et al () also revealed that a is dependent on altitude, while b is dependent on latitude and altitude.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Model 6 in Zone 1, Model 3 in Zones 2 and 3, Model 8 in Zones 4 and 5, and Model 5 in Zone 6 performed best, with all these models taking altitude into account, which implies that altitude was the main factor determining the A‐P parameters in most regions. Our results concurred with those of Paulescu et al (), which demonstrated that altitude is a mandatory input variable to the A‐P model. De Souza et al () also revealed that a is dependent on altitude, while b is dependent on latitude and altitude.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Parameter b reflects the transport properties (aerosol density) of a cloudless atmosphere, affected by altitude and depends mainly on the total water content and turbidity of the atmosphere (Liu et al, ). The sum ( a + b ) represents the clearness index under a clear sky and increases slightly with altitude (Paulescu et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the monthly average hourly clearness index ( k t ) values are calculated and reported in Table 8, which is the ratio of the global solar irradiance on a horizontal surface (I) to the hourly extraterrestrial solar irradiance on a horizontal surface (I o ), as given in Eq. (60).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the Angstrom-Prescott correlation, which represents the simple, linear, and pioneering relationship between clearness index and relative sunshine, was established by Angstrom and then was modified by Prescott [58,59]. Over the last decades, there were considerable endeavors for evaluating and interpreting the Angstrom-Prescott equation [60]. New formulations (either linear or non-linear) of the Angstrom-Prescott equation were proposed by many researchers using clearness index against sunshine fraction [8,36,47,57,[61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69], ambient temperature [8,47,62,67,69,70], relative humidity [8,47,69], precipitation [47,62,71,72], cloud cover [47,57,61,73], and multi-parameters [47,60,67,69,74].…”
Section: Existing Models and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ångström-Prescott (AP) is a model used to estimate the global solar irradiation as a function of solar radiation at the earth's surface and daily sunshine duration [15]. Akarslan et al [16] presents five semi-empirical solar radiation forecasting models based on the AP approach.…”
Section: Semi-empirical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%