2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21511.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angular correlation of the stellar scintillation for large telescopes

Abstract: Stellar scintillation is one of the fundamental limitations to the precision of ground‐based photometry. This paper examines the problem of the correlation of the scintillation of two close stars at the focus of a large telescope. The derived correlation functions were applied to data from the long‐term study of the optical turbulence (OT) in the Northern Caucasus with the MASS (Multi‐Aperture Scintillation Sensor) instrument in order to predict the angular correlation of the scintillation at the Sternberg ins… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the scintillation temporal power spectrum is filtered so that only low-frequency components, f < πD/V ⊥ affect the scintillation power). The scintillation weighting function with an exposure time, t, larger than the crossing time of the speckles is then multiplied by the corresponding wind shear filter function A s = D/πtV ⊥ q (Kornilov 2012a), and, …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the scintillation temporal power spectrum is filtered so that only low-frequency components, f < πD/V ⊥ affect the scintillation power). The scintillation weighting function with an exposure time, t, larger than the crossing time of the speckles is then multiplied by the corresponding wind shear filter function A s = D/πtV ⊥ q (Kornilov 2012a), and, …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scintillation noise on large telescope could be overestimated by an order of magnitude (Kornilov 2012a). This suggests that extremely large telescopes will be even more of a valuable facility for high-precision photometry than previously thought.…”
Section: S C I N T I L L At I O N O N L a R G E A N D E X T R E M E Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, it has been suggested by Osborn et al (2015) that the median value of scintillation is a factor of 1.5 higher than suggested by Equation 5. In the case of differential photometry, the strength of scintillation depends on the number of uncorrelated reference stars n E (Kornilov 2012). The degree of correlation depends on the angular separations of the stars from each other (Kornilov 2012), where 20" is generally the radius within which they are correlated.…”
Section: Scintillationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of differential photometry, the strength of scintillation depends on the number of uncorrelated reference stars n E (Kornilov 2012). The degree of correlation depends on the angular separations of the stars from each other (Kornilov 2012), where 20" is generally the radius within which they are correlated. Combining these two terms, and assuming our target and reference stars are uncorrelated, we have the following equation for the scintillation for differential photometry,…”
Section: Scintillationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the suggestion by Osborn et al (2015), we note that we have multiplied this constant factor by 1.5 from the 0.09 cm 2/3 s 1/2 value originally presented in Young (1967) and Dravins et al (1998), to better reflect the median value of scintillation noise. Finally, the 1 + 1/n E reference star term is derived in Kornilov (2012), and describes the number of uncorrelated reference stars n E . For our observations, we assumed that all our reference stars were uncorrelated.…”
Section: Ground-based Light Curve Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%