2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2015.04.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angular dependence of hydrogen bond energy in neutral and charged systems containing CH and NH proton donors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They were computed to be´4.74 kcal/mol for NH¨¨¨O and´2.06 kcal/mol for CH¨¨¨O, a little less than half the NH¨¨¨O value. These values correspond nicely with other calculations designed to compute these HB energies in other systems [60,68,81,[94][95][96]. The substantial interaction energy for NH···O comes even at the expense of a H-bond that suffers certain distortions from the intermolecular orientation it would adopt in the absence of intramolecular constraints associated with the full molecule I.…”
Section: Direct Evaluation Of H-bond Energiessupporting
confidence: 67%
“…They were computed to be´4.74 kcal/mol for NH¨¨¨O and´2.06 kcal/mol for CH¨¨¨O, a little less than half the NH¨¨¨O value. These values correspond nicely with other calculations designed to compute these HB energies in other systems [60,68,81,[94][95][96]. The substantial interaction energy for NH···O comes even at the expense of a H-bond that suffers certain distortions from the intermolecular orientation it would adopt in the absence of intramolecular constraints associated with the full molecule I.…”
Section: Direct Evaluation Of H-bond Energiessupporting
confidence: 67%
“…They were computed to be −4.74 kcal/mol for NH···O and −2.06 kcal/mol for CH···O, a little less than half the NH···O value. These values correspond nicely with other calculations designed to compute these HB energies in other systems [60,68,81,[94][95][96]. The substantial interaction energy for NH···O comes even at the expense of a H-bond that suffers certain distortions from the intermolecular orientation it would adopt in the absence of intramolecular constraints associated with the full molecule I.…”
Section: Direct Evaluation Of H-bond Energiessupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Notably, further much smaller, attractive components, such as the London dispersion, are not included in this estimate; thus, for very weak hydrogen‐bonding contacts, repulsive estimates are expected. This is mostly the case if the corresponding N1⋅⋅⋅H−X angle deviates strongly from the optimum 180° region, [70] which is the case for most of the presented model systems (cf. Figures 8 and 9 a, ϕ (N1⋅⋅⋅H‐X) mean =136°, Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%