Angular distribution measurements forC14(d, p)C

TheC14(n,γ) cross section between 10 keV and 1 MeV

“…Since this channel contributes less than 5% to the total capture cross section at the relevant energies, the final result is not very sensitive to the particular choice of this spectroscopic factor. A fit to the experimental data, weighted by the relative error bar of each data point, was then performed and resulted in a best-fit spectroscopic factor of C 2 S 0 = 0.95 ± 0.05 for the ground state 1s 1/2 single-particle configuration, which is in good agreement with 0.88 as derived from (d, p) data [31]. The final calculated cross section, convoluted with the different neutron spectra, is compared with the experimental data in Table V.…”

“…3 to facilitate a direct comparison with the data from the activation measurement. The calculated capture to the first excited state of 15 C was normalized by the spectroscopic factor C 2 S 1 = 0.69, extracted from experimental neutron transfer 14 C(d, p) 15 C * data [31]. Since this channel contributes less than 5% to the total capture cross section at the relevant energies, the final result is not very sensitive to the particular choice of this spectroscopic factor.…”

Asymptotic normalization coefficients from the14C(d,p)15Mukhamedzhanov1, Burjan2, Gulino3 et al. 2011Phys. Rev. C359560View full textAdd to dashboardCite

“…] it was shown that the 14 C(n, γ) 15 C radiative capture at astrophysically relevant energies is peripheral reaction, i.e. the overall normalization of its cross section is determined by the asymptotic normalization coefficient (ANC) for 15 …”

“…the overall normalization of its cross section is determined by the asymptotic normalization coefficient (ANC) for 15 …”

C15−F15Charge Symmetry and theTimofeyuk1, Baye2, Descouvemont3 et al. 2006Phys. Rev. Lett.4315922View full textAdd to dashboardCite

“…For the magnitude of its tail to be determined by C mir , the single-particle wave function should be multiplied by a spectroscopic amplitude S 1=2 mir C mir =b s:p: , where b s:p: is the single-particle ANC obtained in such a model. Table II were used in the analysis of the 14 Cd; p 15 C reaction within the distorted wave Born approximation [19], direct (n; ) calculations [5], time-dependent [20], and distorted [21] and from knockout [22], are smaller than C 2 mir and S mir by 25%. This discrepancy may originate due to either insufficient understanding of one-nucleon removal reactions, or to underestimating the R ÿ .…”