1963
DOI: 10.1016/0029-5582(63)90519-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angular distributions for n-p scattering in the energy range 22.5 to 110 MeV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous measurements close to the energy of the present experiment and in the same angular range have been made by Scanlon et al [5] and. by Stahl et al [6].…”
Section: R497supporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous measurements close to the energy of the present experiment and in the same angular range have been made by Scanlon et al [5] and. by Stahl et al [6].…”
Section: R497supporting
confidence: 50%
“…The final experimental values of the differential cross section are listed in Table I [5] and Harvard [6] are also shown.…”
Section: R497mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7͑a͒. Thus we give in the figure the data of Stahl and Ramsey ͓28͔, Chih and Powell ͓29͔, Scanlon et al ͓30͔,and Bersbach et al ͓31͔. It can be seen in the figure that the present data are higher at the most backward angles, which indicates a larger steepness at those angles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…8 shows data from the present experiment together with other forward np scattering data at 90-100 MeV from the literature, i.e., data from Chih et al [32], Griffith et al [33], Bersbach et al [34], and Scanlon et al [35]. The same panel shows the partial wave analyses Nijmegen PWA93 [29] and SAID SP03 [36].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…If we use the full experimental data set, ranging from 20 • to 180 • , but distort the shape of it and subsequently normalize it with the prescription described in this paper, we arrive at slightly different values of the differential cross section. We used a distortion that increases the 0 • and 180 • differential cross sections before normalization with 2%, while keeping the 90 • differential cross section unchanged, and all other cross sections modified with a linear function, i.e., a distortion function looking like the letter V. With such a distortion, the differential cross sections change by up to 1.5% at the worst [29] and SAID SP03 [36] partial wave analyses and with experimental data in the energy region 90-100 MeV from the literature [22,[32][33][34][35]. In the lower panel, the present data are compared with the Nijm93 [37], CD Bonn [38,39], and Paris [40] potentials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%