1989
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.40.670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angular distributions in photodetachment fromO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
69
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Past studies fitting the Cooper−Zare central-potential formula to experimental β(ε) trends for anions have indicated cos δ 2,0 values of ∼0.90−0.95. 32,35 Our own past work has shown that the choice of cos δ 2,0 = 0.95 instead of 1 results in only minor changes in the mixed s−p model predictions. 9 In view of these findings and acknowledging that the phase shift exists but is small, we will set cos δ 2,0 = 0.95 throughout the analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Past studies fitting the Cooper−Zare central-potential formula to experimental β(ε) trends for anions have indicated cos δ 2,0 values of ∼0.90−0.95. 32,35 Our own past work has shown that the choice of cos δ 2,0 = 0.95 instead of 1 results in only minor changes in the mixed s−p model predictions. 9 In view of these findings and acknowledging that the phase shift exists but is small, we will set cos δ 2,0 = 0.95 throughout the analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This is a simplification of the result of an approach initially outlined by Bethe 5 for single-electron atoms, later generalized to multielectron atoms 6,7,43,69 and with the approximation that the relative partial ᐉЈ wave cross sections ͑ ᐉϮ1 ͒ obey the Wigner threshold behavior within a few eV of threshold, 65 so that ᐉ+1 / ᐉ−1 = A · E. The physical picture behind Eq. ͑2͒ is the interference of the two partial electron waves, which of course depends on the relative cross sections ͑carried through the A · E term͒ and their relative phase shift, ␦ ͑ᐉ+1͒−͑ᐉ−1͒ .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…58,[63][64][65][66][67][68] In these cases, the change in ␤ can be explained through consideration of the dominant long range term in the potential, the centrifugal term. The free electron wave can be represented as a superposition of partial angular momentum waves for which we will use the symbol ᐉЈ ͑=ᐉ Ϯ 1͒ to allow distinction from the parent orbital angular momentum quantum number ᐉ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations