1961
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.124.1899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angular Distributions of 4.43-Mev Gamma Radiation fromC12(p, pγ)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1962
1962
1979
1979

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the experiment reported here did not have the same bombardment energies and target techniques as Oohen's, a similar activation experiment to his is now in progress in this laboratory. A confirmation of the discrepancy is also given by the inelastic scattering experiment of the Florida group, Adams et al (1962), who noted the absence of gamma rays higher in energy than the 4.43 MeV ray being investigated. However, their limits of detection are an order of magnitude higher than the present ones.…”
supporting
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the experiment reported here did not have the same bombardment energies and target techniques as Oohen's, a similar activation experiment to his is now in progress in this laboratory. A confirmation of the discrepancy is also given by the inelastic scattering experiment of the Florida group, Adams et al (1962), who noted the absence of gamma rays higher in energy than the 4.43 MeV ray being investigated. However, their limits of detection are an order of magnitude higher than the present ones.…”
supporting
confidence: 48%
“…No evidence for the presence of either '(0 or '(1 was found and as the detector efficiency is approximately known at these energies (Nordhagen 1961) a limit was placed on the differential cross sections, a(p,yo) and a(p''(l)' by a simple comparison with the known differential cross section, a(p,p') for inelastic scattering (McKenna and Shute 1961;Adams et al 1962). These limits are shown in Table 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy of protons striking the samples was 7.0 f 0.1 MeV. This bombardment energy is above the threshold for inelastic scattering to the first excited state of carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur and is at a nonresonant portion of the excitation functions (13) to the first excited state of carbon (14). On passing through the filter, the beam loses 0.38 MeV which drops the beam energy below the effective threshold for inelastic scattering to the 3-state in l60.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…There is some evidence (Mitchell, personal communication 1961;Adams et al 1961) for a level at ELAB = 10·75 and also for one or more levels above 11 MeV.…”
Section: Non-resonant Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%