“…On the other hand, at λ= 3.05 nm (404.8 eV) no thermal ion peak is observed. The present data are compared to the kinetic energy spectra obtained by Yagishita et al [26] by using a parallel-plate analyzer without mass discrimination. These measurements were performed at 0° and 90° with respect to the polarization direction of the photon beam.…”
Section: The N + Translational Energy Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Without mass selection, Yagishita et al [26] observed a kinetic energy distribution peaking at 1.5 eV for 2.95 nm (419 eV) photons. They ascribed it to the N 2 2+ (≈60 eV)→N + +N (at 54 eV).…”
Section: The N + Translational Energy Distributionsmentioning
An ion retarding potential difference (IRPD) method has been used to investigate the ion yield and kinetic energy distributions of N + /N 2 produced by photoionization mass spectrometry using synchrotron radiation. Photoion yield curves of energy selected N + ions are deduced. Translational energy distributions of N + at energies of the N(1s)→π*, N(1s)→ (nl) 1 and above the N(1s) -1 threshold are determined. Comparison is made with previous photoion-photoelectron coincidence work using time-of-flight (TOF) measurements.
“…On the other hand, at λ= 3.05 nm (404.8 eV) no thermal ion peak is observed. The present data are compared to the kinetic energy spectra obtained by Yagishita et al [26] by using a parallel-plate analyzer without mass discrimination. These measurements were performed at 0° and 90° with respect to the polarization direction of the photon beam.…”
Section: The N + Translational Energy Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Without mass selection, Yagishita et al [26] observed a kinetic energy distribution peaking at 1.5 eV for 2.95 nm (419 eV) photons. They ascribed it to the N 2 2+ (≈60 eV)→N + +N (at 54 eV).…”
Section: The N + Translational Energy Distributionsmentioning
An ion retarding potential difference (IRPD) method has been used to investigate the ion yield and kinetic energy distributions of N + /N 2 produced by photoionization mass spectrometry using synchrotron radiation. Photoion yield curves of energy selected N + ions are deduced. Translational energy distributions of N + at energies of the N(1s)→π*, N(1s)→ (nl) 1 and above the N(1s) -1 threshold are determined. Comparison is made with previous photoion-photoelectron coincidence work using time-of-flight (TOF) measurements.
“…The angle-resolved ion-yield spectroscopy of fragment ions provides information about symmetries of inner-shell excited states of linear molecules [37][38][39], because the direction of the ion ejection relative to the polarization vector E reflects the direction of the dipole moment relative to the molecular axis. This type of measurements, called symmetry-resolved absorption spectroscopy [40][41][42], relies on the fact that the core-hole decay and fragmentation occur much faster than the molecular rotation, and thus the axial-recoil approximation [43,44] is valid.…”
Out-of-plane nuclear motion stimulated in the core-excited state and symmetry breaking due to this nuclear motion have been investigated for B 1s excitation in the BF 3 molecule by a combination of three different experimental methods: angle-resolved ion-yield spectroscopy, vibrationally resolved resonant Auger electron spectroscopy and quadruple-ion coincidence momentum-imaging technique.
“…New observations of ion angular distributions from free molecules (Yagishita et al, 1989) suggest that de tailed information on alignment processes follow"ng x-ray absorp tion can be monitored in a unique way. Angle-resolved measure ments on ions are much less efficient than integral measurements, thus requiring a much more intense x-ray source.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.