1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf00671343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angular momentum, magnetic moment, andg-factor in general relativity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In that sense, the g-factor is a good indicator of the strength of the gravitational field in an insulating perfect fluid, but is little dependent on the angular velocity of the star. In our study, the value g = 2 seems linked only with the black hole solution but, from other works, [14], [15] and [11], one can see that this may depend on the total charge of the system. An important improvement of our work would be to allow for any charge of the system, that is compatible with the stationarity assumption and therefore allow for differential rotation, which may open new possibilities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In that sense, the g-factor is a good indicator of the strength of the gravitational field in an insulating perfect fluid, but is little dependent on the angular velocity of the star. In our study, the value g = 2 seems linked only with the black hole solution but, from other works, [14], [15] and [11], one can see that this may depend on the total charge of the system. An important improvement of our work would be to allow for any charge of the system, that is compatible with the stationarity assumption and therefore allow for differential rotation, which may open new possibilities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Qualitatively, both studies agree: for Q/M 1 and taking into account energy conditions, Pfister and King find that g varies between ∼1 for a low compaction parameter, and 2 in the collapse limit. With a similar kind of problem, Mustafa et al [11] found that g could reach values very close to 2, for the charge-to-mass ratio less than unity and the shell radius approaching the event horizon value.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pfister and King considered the case of a rotating charged mass shell [8]. Apart from generalising previous studies on this matter [9][10][11], they noticed that g ≈ 2 is extremely robust, in the sense that this value is obtained in a big part of the mass shell's parameter space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This has the simplifying consequence that gravitational and electromagnetic effects decouple, and one has to solve only the Maxwell equations on a rotationally disturbed Schwarzschild background in the first order of an angular velocity ω. For arbitrary mass and charge Briggs et al [40], and Mustafa et al [41] succeeded in solving the coupled Einstein-Maxwell equations, resulting from a rotational dipole perturbation of the Reissner-Nordström solution. Their discussion of the g factor was, however, limited to some special cases (such as the weak-field and the collapse limit, the extreme Reissner-Nordström case, and the weak-field limit of the overextreme Reissner-Nordström case), and to some fixed values of q/M.…”
Section: The G Factor For Charged Mass Shellsmentioning
confidence: 99%