1968
DOI: 10.1080/10671188.1968.10613442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angular Velocity and Range of Motion in the Vertical and Standing Broad Jumps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
2

Year Published

1980
1980
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly to F 0 , the positive influence of v 0 on h max is in accordance with studies showing that frog muscles used to power jumping are mainly composed of fast-twitch muscle fibres (Lutz et al, 1998;Marsh, 1994), and with studies relating jumping performance to muscle strength only at high movement velocity (Eckert, 1968). The effect of v 0 on jumping performance has also been suggested through the positions of muscles insertion around joints, favouring in many cases the velocity of movement (Emerson, 1985).…”
Section: Jumping Ability Is Explained By Only Three Integrative Mechasupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Similarly to F 0 , the positive influence of v 0 on h max is in accordance with studies showing that frog muscles used to power jumping are mainly composed of fast-twitch muscle fibres (Lutz et al, 1998;Marsh, 1994), and with studies relating jumping performance to muscle strength only at high movement velocity (Eckert, 1968). The effect of v 0 on jumping performance has also been suggested through the positions of muscles insertion around joints, favouring in many cases the velocity of movement (Emerson, 1985).…”
Section: Jumping Ability Is Explained By Only Three Integrative Mechasupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Eckert (1968) found that maximal angular velocities of the leg were significantly correlated with the vertical jump in males, but not in females. However, most investigators, using arm movements, have found nonsignificant correlations between speed of limb movement and strength of the involved muscles (Clarke, 1960;Henry & Whitley, 1960;Smith, 1961a;Rasch, 1954).…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Early experimental studies have demonstrated differences between horizontal and vertical jumps in the contributions of different joints (45.9%, 3.9%, and 50.2% vs. 40%, 24.2%, and 35.8% for the hip joint, knee joint, and ankle joint in the horizontal and vertical jumps, respectively; Robertson & Fleming, 1987). Moreover, the range of motion and angular velocity of the hip joint are larger during the horizontal jump, while the range of motion and angular velocity of the knee joint are larger during the vertical jump (Eckert, 1968). Finally, it has been shown that the magnitude of hip flexion, total range of motion of the hip joint, and force generated by the hip muscles are larger in the horizontal jump than in the vertical jump (Nagano et al, 2007).…”
Section: Correlations Between Vbt-variables and Different Jumpsmentioning
confidence: 95%