2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevmaterials.3.033607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anharmonicity in elastic constants and extended x-ray-absorption fine structure cumulants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S 0 2 and Δ E 0 were determined at the lowest temperature (20 K) and then fixed for all other temperatures (as done by others in temperature-dependent studies of EXAFS Debye–Waller factors) . Δ E 0 and S 0 2 can influence the absolute values of R EXAFS , C 2 , and C 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…S 0 2 and Δ E 0 were determined at the lowest temperature (20 K) and then fixed for all other temperatures (as done by others in temperature-dependent studies of EXAFS Debye–Waller factors) . Δ E 0 and S 0 2 can influence the absolute values of R EXAFS , C 2 , and C 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the analysis of the Artemis Fit results, we used the relative values Δ C 3 with respect to the lowest temperature for the temperature-dependent C 3 cumulants, as we did for R EXAFS and C 2 . Δ C 3 was fitted by a simplified version of the classical approximation for cumulants valid for higher temperatures , Here, k B (eV·K –1 ) is the Boltzmann constant, k 0 is the effective (harmonic) force constant determined with C 2 ( T ), and k 3 (eV Å –3 ) is the higher-order (anharmonic) force constant. According to Frenkel et al, our used approximation for higher temperatures for C 3 ( T ) is already valid for RbBr at 125 K so that we can assume that an adjustment of Δ C 3 in the orthorhombic phases (up to 160 K) is also meaningful.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end of this section, the interatomic potentials around Fe are summarized in Figure 8 to compare between the three different Fe-based alloys of the Invar (Fe 65 Ni 35 ), SUS316L (Fe 67 Cr 18 Ni 12 Mo 2 Mn 1 ) [47] , and Elinvar (Fe 50 Ni 42 Cr 6 Ti 4 ) [34] alloys. The stainless steel SUS316L alloy exhibits normal thermal expansion that is quantitatively almost the same as that of SUS304 in Figure 4A.…”
Section: Invar Alloymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…alloys. FM and NM denote the ferromagnetically coupled high-spin and nonmagnetic low-spin Fe, respectively [47] .…”
Section: Zinc Blendementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation