2015
DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2015.208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anicteric veno-occlusive disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The main difference between the two diagnostic systems is hyperbilirubinemia being mandatory in the Baltimore criteria, which implies longer time waiting for its development or intrinsically more aggressive forms. Up to 30% of children with VOD/SOS was anicteric (7,45,46) compared to 12% of adults. The clinical scenario can be variable, in particular in children where anicteric forms are not rare (13,47) and dynamically changing.…”
Section: Clinical Presentation and Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difference between the two diagnostic systems is hyperbilirubinemia being mandatory in the Baltimore criteria, which implies longer time waiting for its development or intrinsically more aggressive forms. Up to 30% of children with VOD/SOS was anicteric (7,45,46) compared to 12% of adults. The clinical scenario can be variable, in particular in children where anicteric forms are not rare (13,47) and dynamically changing.…”
Section: Clinical Presentation and Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Demonstration of reversal of portal venous blood flow (RPVF) by ultrasonography is suggestive of VOD but is not pathognomonic because as flow can remain normal in the presence of VOD [8] or be reversed in other clinical settings. Moreover, RPVF is not included in either the Seattle or Baltimore diagnostic criteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liver biopsy can provide a definitive diagnosis; however, because of thrombocytopenia and coagulopathy, biopsies are rarely performed. Anicteric VOD (total bilirubin < 2 mg at diagnosis and remains below 2 mg/ dL throughout the course of the disease) is well described in the pediatric literature [8,9] but is not captured using the Baltimore criteria, for which hyperbilirubinemia is a mandatory criteria. Some providers and/or institutions use the Baltimore criteria, whereas others use the Seattle criteria to diagnose VOD, further complicating management and study of this syndrome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With increased applications of HCT for different disease indications, evaluation and treatment of HCT‐related complications have become increasingly important to mitigate early transplant‐related mortality and improve outcomes . SOS can be a devastating complication after HCT . Several studies have demonstrated that up to 50% of patients with SOS develop renal or pulmonary dysfunction .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, it is critical to avoid exacerbating AKI with aggressive diuresis or rapid removal of ascetic fluid. HCT recipients often require intravenous parenteral nutrition, frequent administration of blood products, and multiple nephrotoxic medications, all of which may worsen FO, further contributing to AKI . Therefore, management of AKI and FO in HCT patients is particularly challenging; and when FO >20% or is refractory to conventional pharmaceutical diuresis, CRRT may need to be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%