1998
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.80.6.606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Animal experimental implantation of an atrial septal defect occluder system

Abstract: Objective-To establish the implantation technique for the atrial septal defect occluder system (ASDOS) device in an experimental animal model and to determine long term mechanical stability of the device and its in vivo properties in terms of biocompatibility and tissue reaction. Materials and methods-An atrial septal defect was created and the device implanted in 17 pigs (mean weight 30 kg). The implantation technique was refined and modified because of initial technical and anatomical complications during ni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Besides individual case reports, 13 14 there is only one published series in humans describing the healing response to the historical clampshell device used for various defect closures performed during regulatory trials. 1 This device was withdrawn from the market owing to a high rate of metal arm fractures 15 16 and-following a redesign of the framework-replaced by the Cardioseal device in 1996 and its self-centring modification, the Starflex device in 1998.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Besides individual case reports, 13 14 there is only one published series in humans describing the healing response to the historical clampshell device used for various defect closures performed during regulatory trials. 1 This device was withdrawn from the market owing to a high rate of metal arm fractures 15 16 and-following a redesign of the framework-replaced by the Cardioseal device in 1996 and its self-centring modification, the Starflex device in 1998.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Follow-up periods in vivo after device implantation in these studies usually range between 3 months and 2 years because of the necessity to obtain timely results from experiments which are highly demanding with regard to time, costs and effort. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] This relatively short follow-up period with regard to local tissue response and biocompatibility contrasts with the expected lifelong implant persistence of some 70-80 years in young children.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in experimental animals have characterized the histologic features and time course of the healing response and tissue ingrowth onto the device after implantation (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In yet another animal experiment, ASD was occluded with ASDOS device [22]. The pathomorphological changes referred to by authors as chronic changes, appeared in pigs after 3 and 6 months following the implantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%