2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0041-0101(03)00125-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Animal experimentation in snake venom research and in vitro alternatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, eggs were used in their shells which have advantages in terms of saving time, eliminating the need for costly equipments and are also suitable for qualitative haemorrhagic tests (Sells, 2003). The haemorrhagic response of venom was dose dependent and there was an increasing tendency of bleeding when the concentration of the venom was gradually increased from 0.1 to 4.0 mg per 1.5 mL PBS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, eggs were used in their shells which have advantages in terms of saving time, eliminating the need for costly equipments and are also suitable for qualitative haemorrhagic tests (Sells, 2003). The haemorrhagic response of venom was dose dependent and there was an increasing tendency of bleeding when the concentration of the venom was gradually increased from 0.1 to 4.0 mg per 1.5 mL PBS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These eggs were incubated at 37.8 C and 60% humidity in an artificial incubator. The test was performed on the eggs in their shells on day 4, after spraying with 70% ethanol and air dried for 10 min to avoid contamination and rupturing of yolk (Glunder, Jantzen, & Habermehl, 2001;Kunzi, Kaskel, Steiner, Peter, & Krahn, 2001;Sells, 2003).…”
Section: Preparation Of Eggsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They may depend on the assumption that the animal or pharmacological substrates used in the test have human counterparts and extrapolation from in vitro results to the in vivo clinical situation may be perilous. The most acceptable in vitro assays, both scientifically and ethically are those in which human tissue is used [39]. From this point of view, primary cultures from tissue biopsies appear to be the best choice for disintegrin testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other in vivo and in vitro tests commonly used include the elimination of venom-induced pathogenic effects such as those responsible for haemorrhage, coagulopathy (including defibrinogenation), and local necrosis [43,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53]. In vivo tests involve major suffering to the experimental animals involved and currently major efforts are being made to develop non-sentient or other alternative assays [54]. One proposed assay is the use of EIA which, in some circumstances can theoretically replace the standard lethality assay; in one study, good correlation (r = 0.96) was obtained between the rodent ED 50 test and the ED 50 as estimated using EIA [55].…”
Section: Major Roles Of Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (Elisa) mentioning
confidence: 99%