2017
DOI: 10.1177/0309132517699924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Animal geographies II

Abstract: Hybridizing animal geographies scholarship encourages creative conversations among geography sub-disciplines and generates holistic knowledge of human-animal relations. This article surveys existing trends in ‘hybridity’ as a foundational concept emerging from animal geographies primarily located within human realms of geography. Fully operationalizing hybridity requires affective engagements with animals through interdisciplinary investigations of animal agency, behaviours and experiences. To this end, this a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in this paper, we argue that conservation biologists’ scientific scholarship and public communications are indeed producing insights into the lives of animals; animal geographers have recently begun to recognize this and have made calls for more collaboration with natural scientists [37,42,43]. Bringing together different perspectives of animals may therefore be more fruitful for understanding the inner lives of animals in a non-anthropocentric way [17,37,43].…”
Section: Animal Geographymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in this paper, we argue that conservation biologists’ scientific scholarship and public communications are indeed producing insights into the lives of animals; animal geographers have recently begun to recognize this and have made calls for more collaboration with natural scientists [37,42,43]. Bringing together different perspectives of animals may therefore be more fruitful for understanding the inner lives of animals in a non-anthropocentric way [17,37,43].…”
Section: Animal Geographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compassionate conservation and animal geography, a sub-discipline of human geography, share two important foundational tenets: (1) both bodies of scholarship developed as a response to the ethical and political responsibilities we hold toward the animals we share our world with [42,44]; and (2) both bodies of scholarship seek to ensure that (individual) animals’ needs are not simply ignored or unthinkingly placed below humans’ needs [7,15,44]. However, animal geography also moves beyond these anthropocentric concerns and attempts to understand the lives of animals in and of themselves, not only as individuals, but as beings who have lived experiences and agency [37,38,43,45,46]. Animal geography is therefore well-positioned to contribute to extending the field of compassionate conservation by highlighting these aspects.…”
Section: Animal Geographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a start, as Braidotti () argues, they have comfortably co‐existed in and co‐facilitated the emergence of a number transdisciplinary “hubs,” ‐ creative yet applied empirical convergences of posthumanism. These include biosocial and biopolitics studies (Rutherford & Rutherford, ), science and technology studies (Greenhough, ), arts performance studies (Boyd, ), physical culture studies (Spinney, ), sensory studies (Paterson, ), animal relations studies (Hovorka, ), hybrid/hybridity studies (Whatmore, ) and, to an extent, parts of new mobilities (Merriman, ), and emotional studies (Anderson & Harrison, ). Of course, all of these theoretical orientations and empirical convergences appear in, and are contributed to by, social science and humanities disciplines other than human geography.…”
Section: Moving Towards a Posthumanist Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I engage osprey cultural geographies via a hybrid conceptual frame (see Hovorka, ) drawing inspiration from “speculative” approaches to ethology (the science of animal behaviour). Such work continues the maverick, creative, creaturely spirit championed by early pioneers of ethological study (see Lorimer, ).…”
Section: Extinction Culture and More‐than‐human Geographiesmentioning
confidence: 99%