DOI: 10.31274/etd-180810-2603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Animal-human interaction comparing live human observation and digital image evaluation methodologies

Abstract: base proximities were closer (P < 0.008) in the "look" category compared to CV-PCVM and saline treatments post-injection. Snout proximities of pigs classified in the "look" category were farther (P < 0.05) from the human observer in the CV-PCVM compared to CF/MF and saline treated pigs post-injection. The treatment effects yielded more negative or lethargic behaviors in the CV-PCVM group compared to CF/MF and saline. Future work should focus on determining the behavioral effects from each portion of the vaccin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In swine production, humans may have little interaction with pigs other than situations that may be perceived as negative by the pig. These situations can include medically treating (Weimer, 2012), castrating, tail docking, restraining, and sorting pigs (Waiblinger et al, 2006). With little opportunity to habituate, it is suggested that even domesticated animals may often perceive humans as predators (Suarez and Gallup, 1982).…”
Section: Solitarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In swine production, humans may have little interaction with pigs other than situations that may be perceived as negative by the pig. These situations can include medically treating (Weimer, 2012), castrating, tail docking, restraining, and sorting pigs (Waiblinger et al, 2006). With little opportunity to habituate, it is suggested that even domesticated animals may often perceive humans as predators (Suarez and Gallup, 1982).…”
Section: Solitarymentioning
confidence: 99%