2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2020.110533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Animal intermittent locomotion: A null model for the probability of moving forward in bounded space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These patterns inspired a stochastic model that is compatible with the observations of the rodent cautious walks. A central observation is that the animals slow down in order to re-evaluate the environment, with its potential danger and rewards (these stops might further develop into fear-or startle-induced behavioral arrests [33], or present as just a punctuation in the ongoing locomotor activity [32]). To describe this, we assumed the existence of two interfering processes: in addition to the impulses to move arriving at random times, continuous deceleration must be taken into account.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These patterns inspired a stochastic model that is compatible with the observations of the rodent cautious walks. A central observation is that the animals slow down in order to re-evaluate the environment, with its potential danger and rewards (these stops might further develop into fear-or startle-induced behavioral arrests [33], or present as just a punctuation in the ongoing locomotor activity [32]). To describe this, we assumed the existence of two interfering processes: in addition to the impulses to move arriving at random times, continuous deceleration must be taken into account.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since in our experiments the rodent pups (below the age of solid food ingestion) demonstrated velocity patterns similar to those in adult animals (figures 4, 6, 8), we could not ascribe the stops or lingering to putative foraging attempts. As the decelerated episodes were characterized by the lateral head scans [57] and used for reorientation [32], we hypothesize that they reflect the process of risk assessment, necessary for prey animals in the wild. One might attribute the animals' deceleration (i.e, action-stopping) behavior to the so called proactive inhibition [60][61][62], a condition where inhibition is strongly facilitated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animals tend to display saltatory patterns of movements [O’Brien et al, 1990], with pauses punctuating the tracks. The pauses are used to rest, forage or make a decision about the next move [Christensen et al 2015; Hunt et al, 2016;Christensen et al, 2021]. The locomotor strategies of previsual pups in the present experiments looked like a superposition of simplified trips and extended stops.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The random walks of animals can be affected by geometry of the space and its boundedness [Christensen et al, 2021]. In rodents, the boundary effects are the most prominent, since they prefer to move thigmotactically minimizing the risk of predation and maximizing security [Nemati et al, 2013;Whishaw et al, 2006].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider the sampling area to be non‐confined so that individuals can move beyond this region or even return during the course of their movement. This is to avoid any unnecessary geometry‐specific biases, or any complexities that can arise due to individual interactions in the case a boundary was present (Bearup & Petrovskii, 2015; Christensen et al, 2021; Cocconi et al, 2021).…”
Section: Modelling Movement and Trapping Of Ground‐dwelling Arthropodsmentioning
confidence: 99%