The two "rules of speciation"-the Large X-effect and Haldane's rule-hold throughout the animal kingdom, but the underlying genetic mechanisms that cause them are still unclear. Two predominant explanations-the "dominance theory" and faster male evolution-both have some empirical support, suggesting that the genetic basis of these rules is likely multifarious. We revisit one historical explanation for these rules, based on dysfunctional genetic interactions involving genes recently moved between chromosomes. We suggest that gene movement specifically off or onto the X chromosome is another mechanism that could contribute to the two rules, especially as X chromosome movements can be subject to unique sex-specific and sex chromosome specific consequences in hybrids. Our hypothesis is supported by patterns emerging from comparative genomic data, including a strong bias in interchromosomal gene movements involving the X and an overrepresentation of male reproductive functions among chromosomally relocated genes. In addition, our model indicates that the contribution of gene movement to the two rules in any specific group will depend upon key developmental and reproductive parameters that are taxon specific. We provide several testable predictions that can be used to assess the importance of gene movement as a contributor to these rules in the future.
K E Y W O R D S :Gene relocation, genomics, hybrid incompatibility, sterility, X chromosome.Interest in the genetic basis of speciation has exploded in the last few decades, fueled in large part by the application of new molecular genetic techniques to classical genetic studies of reproductive barriers between species (Coyne and Orr 2004). Much of this work-done in animal species with heterogametic sexdetermination-supports the existence of what have been called the "two rules of speciation" (Coyne and Orr 1989): the Large X-effect (the disproportionate influence of the X chromosome on the expression of interspecific hybrid incompatibility, particularly male sterility) and Haldane's rule (the observation that the heterogametic [XY or ZW] sex is disproportionately weaker or sterile in interspecific hybrids). Because of the prevalence of these patterns in a broad range of animal species (Coyne and Orr 2004), intense interest has focused on explaining their mechanistic basis, both with theoretical models (e.g., Orr and Turelli 2001) and emerging empirical data (e.g., Laurie 1997;Orr 1997;Masly and Presgraves 2007). These efforts have generated a set of plausible, often nonexclusive, explanations for the two patterns (Coyne and Orr 2004). However, disagreement remains over the predominant underlying genetic mechanism(s) responsible. The ubiquity of these patterns initially suggested that each might be due to a single common mechanism in heterogametic animal groups (Orr 1997). However, empirical support for several alternative hypotheses suggests that the genetic mechanisms contributing to these rules are likely multifarious (Orr 1993;Wu and Davis 1993;Coyne and Orr 2004). I...