1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1077(199706)12:2+<s59::aid-hup903>3.0.co;2-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Animal Models of Addiction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be speculated that dopamine released in the nucleus accumbens (a part of the limbic forebrain) on chronic treatment with THC [69] may in turn trigger anandamide formation (as previously shown for the dorsal striatum [64]). A similar stimulatory action by dopamine may also explain the finding of a trend for enhanced levels of anandamide in the cerebrospinal fluid of schizophrenic patients [66], where an hyperactivity of the dopaminergic signalling system was suggested to occur [70]. Overall, these findings suggest that drugs reinforcing (i.e.…”
Section: Central Nervous Systemmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…It can be speculated that dopamine released in the nucleus accumbens (a part of the limbic forebrain) on chronic treatment with THC [69] may in turn trigger anandamide formation (as previously shown for the dorsal striatum [64]). A similar stimulatory action by dopamine may also explain the finding of a trend for enhanced levels of anandamide in the cerebrospinal fluid of schizophrenic patients [66], where an hyperactivity of the dopaminergic signalling system was suggested to occur [70]. Overall, these findings suggest that drugs reinforcing (i.e.…”
Section: Central Nervous Systemmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…These are typically assessed in humans using subjective questionnaires and drug self-administration paradigms (Comer et al, 2008a; Haney and Spealman, 2008). Preclinically, self-administration and condition place preference (CPP) paradigms are commonly used to examine the reinforcing and rewarding effects of drugs (Epstein et al, 2006; Haney and Spealman, 2008; Willner, 1997). The abuse potential of μ-opioid receptor agonists has been extensively demonstrated in rodents, non-human primates, and humans (see Kieffer and Gavériaux-Ruff, 2002; Preston and Jasinki, 1991 and Trigo et al, 2010 for reviews).…”
Section: A Brief Overview Of Opioid Abusementioning
confidence: 99%
“…D 2 receptors also are believed to mediate the reinforcing, dependency-producing effects of a variety of dissimilar drugs of abuse. Reinforcing effects of alcohol and morphine self-administration are diminished in D 2 receptor gene knockout mice and by pretreatment with D 2 antagonists. Treatments of psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia include traditional neuroleptics (e.g., chlorpromazine, fluphenazine, haloperidol) introduced in the 1950s and modern, atypical, or “second-generation” antipsychotics (e.g., aripiprazole, clozapine, iloperidone, lurasidone, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, risperidone, ziprasidone). Both types of antipsychotics have broad utility in the treatment of mania, schizophrenia, and other psychotic disorders, but the modern agents are generally less potent D 2 antagonists and more potent antagonists of serotonin 5-HT 2A (5-hydroxytryptamine) receptors, and they pose less risk of adverse acute and late extrapyramidal neurological effects. Modern antipsychotic drugs are approximately as effective as the classic neuroleptics but with limited or different safety concerns.…”
Section: Pharmacology Of Dopamine Receptor Subtypesmentioning
confidence: 99%